User talk:Parserpractice

2

Image copyright problem with File:NTSB Flight 11 ground track.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NTSB Flight 11 ground track.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters[edit]

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of 9/11 Truth Movement‎, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards — Cs32en 09:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates[edit]

The purpose of maintenance templates is so that an editor can draw attention to a problem they cannot fix themselves. They should not be removed until the problem identified has been resolved. Since the article is still far too detailed for an encyclopedic treatment of this topic, kindly do not remove the tag. –xeno^talk 21:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You already stopped it.[edit]

Will investigate. Rich Farmbrough 01:09 18 October 2009 (UTC).

OK I have fixed up the (rest?) of the problems on that page. I will do some tests and log an AWB bug if necessary. Rich Farmbrough, 01:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Please focus on content, not on editors.[edit]

Please focus on content, not editors. wp:SOFIXIT.- Sinneed 19:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Please focus on content", you say? As you say, you do not source material for others, "superwombatsearchengines", etc., etc. Not only do you not source, you have yet to provide content to support your history of edits to the article. Perhaps you describe what 'Parserpractice' should reply to you with?

Parserpractice (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not appropriate. Please see wp:NPA. Please focus on content, not editors. Please specifically remove your focus from me entirely.- Sinneed 19:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Please specifically remove your focus from me ...", you say? And Colonel Marr and Gen. Arnold, also, perhaps? NORAD, etc. ...

Parserpractice (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]