User talk:Orrl

November 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ageing, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. *This includes citing sources which you might have written ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changes suggestion[edit]

Hi, Since my last change some time went by, and I find it important for researchers and common readers who are interested in aging to see the progress in that field. Due to the explosion of scRNA seq data, new ways of analyzing the mystery of aging have been proposed. The paragraph which I am suggesting to add, solves a long standing puzzle regarding aging, and its characteristics. I have added some citations, and hopefully it would be accepted and appreciated. Orrl (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Orrl. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ageing, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

You can always ask for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
For content related to human health, Wikipedia editors strongly prefer a good review article instead of citing the original publication. I know that goes against the academic notion of "priority" and it means Wikipedia is always out of date, but it also stops other people from cherry-picking the one study that supposedly "proves" colloidal silver cures HIV, or whatever their obsession is, so we think that it's the best choice, on balance.

Happy editing, WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]