User talk:N1197L

November 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 12:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SpacemanSpiff. Its been a long time and I see form your activities that no one has tried to bring a change in you. I just don't care about the warnings and publicity stunts you roll out. In fact you should

messing around here and if you are so anti-indian, you don't deserve to live here. Just leave the country and migrate to wherever you came from. I advise you that you better don't mess with the people you are no match for and this is my answer to your warning: If you can't resolve puny matters on your own and use brute force stuff on members just because you are no match for them... you don't deserve to be an administrator here. So try to raise you level of intelligence, walk away, don't turn back and stop crying for help from the reputed administrators. Be proud of the country you live in and contribute in its development instead of creating hurdles.

Hence with all due RESPECT if you got some little self-respect left I don't want to hear from you again or see any misuse of the rights, that you were not supposed to have, on me ONLY if you have any self-respect left. Thanks for the

sign though.

Note: I did not use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Each and every of the three conditions by you are not satisfied. Hence the blocking policy is not applicable on me. #Self_Respect_left? N1197L (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello, N1197L. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 15:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And of course, now you're misrepresenting references to promote the same stuff that your other account/collective that includes Spjayswal who NeilN blocked for legal threats did. —SpacemanSpiff 15:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SpacemanSpiff, I thank you heartily for welcoming me on Wikipedia. I would like to write something w.r.t the points you addressed:

avoid editing or creating: I will surely remember that and I am not at all interested in creating articles about people in my life. Thank You for informing me about that.
propose changes: I am extremely sorry for deleting the tag on that page. In future, I will address any major changes for such articles in the talk page. I didn't know that I annoyed reputed administrators and contributors of the free encyclopaedia. Sorry for that.
disclose: Already said that I am not at all interested in theses things, and if in future such need arises I will disclose according to rules. Thanks.
Avoid linking: Never ever gonna do that nor ever did. Thanks.
do your best: I will do my best to comply with the content policies of the free encyclopaedia. Thanks.

And with regards to the promotion of any stuff, I would like to tell you that I am too lazy to even blink my eyelids, so I am mostly asleep, let alone any promotion like stuff.

And with regards to other accounts, this is my first ever account on Wikipedia. Since I am an engineering student, I created this account to get and knowledge and make correct knowledge available to all the world. You can see my contributions in the field of engineering topics. But I didn't really hoped that the reputed administrators will assault me like this if I dare to interfere with any disputed article. This really doesn't represent the free encyclopaedia. I am really disappointed with this behaviour :(

I spent the day searching the references which I put in that article, very hard to find, to make that prize notable since it is a government prize. So please, I am not MISREPRESENTING any references in any term.

And also, I don't give a thought to any user being blocked for whatever reason. So I didn't understand why I was told this. So I am really disappointed with your behaviour :(

This was a very bad experience of my life with which I thought the best encyclopaedia available on earth. Thanks a lot.

PROtip: Would you mind explaining the meaning of 'unadulterated bovine excrement'? Could not find that on google, it failed on that. Thank you N1197L (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your very bad experience is due to the fact that you are trying to make this encyclopaedia crappy, and while you may not have given thought to being blocked, it will be necessary to protect the encyclopaedia if this behavior of yours continues. Either you're trying to promote and play dumb by acting confused as to why a reference on apples is not applicable to oranges or you genuinely don't understand, both of which are problematic for the encyclopaedia. —SpacemanSpiff 03:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't knew that adding universally correct and useful information, which is understandable and acceptable by a normal human being except some, to the free encyclopaedia is making it CRAPPY. And let me tell you clearly that I am EXTREMELY BAD at acting dumb and foolish. I usually let other people play that part whenever and wherever I like. And I thought that you are wise enough to read the promotion thing I mentioned earlier, if not then I am telling you again politely that I AM TOO LAZY TO EVEN BLINK MY EYELIDS, LET ALONE ANY PROMOTION LIKE THING. So please try not to assault me again on that baseless promotion or blocking topics, will u please? BTW I am too busy to complete my NPTEL online certification course on Mechanisms and Robot Kinematics, really tough one if your UNDERSTANDING can understand that. Seriously you make me sad with your messages. Very disappointing :(

You are a very prestigious and reputed administrator of Wikipedia, so I request you to stop assaulting me on baseless FACTS.

ProTip: You didn't even told me the meaning of 'unadulterated bovine excrement' and you put that apples and oranges thing again! I failed on such a high quality English. My knowledge is competent enough to match the limits of most of the editors on the free encyclopaedia, cause I am an ENGINEERING student and I have the answer to life the universe and everything, which is 42. Not necessary that a newbie is definitely a noob. Would like to remind you that 'Knowledge is limitless' and you know that better than anyone. Politely —N1197L (talk) 13:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have massively trimmed the article and sent it to WP:AFD. The "apples and oranges" point is, for example, where you added citations that did not verify the various people as recipients of the award. It is no use adding a cite to verify that they are an actor or a scientist or whatever if the point that causes them to be listed in the article (ie: that they got the award) isn't verified. You're using an "apple" where we need an "orange", and at the risk of confusing you further, when you do that we end up with a lemon of an article. - Sitush (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great work Sitush!!! With due RESPECT your country (even if it is India) is very proud to have people of such a deprecated logical reasoning and intelligence who just jump in any discussion on some similar level intellectual's plea without having any knowledge of what evidence and citations (you think there should have been) had already been presented (and removed by the other guy because he was too afraid to lose) and most importantly without going through what is being discussed and what is even going on and just starts giving out the phrases taught in some university without even knowing when or where to use it!!! Keep up the good job.

Note: Nothing here... just read the stuff above and think upon your life. If you consider this as so called ranting... it means that you have no idea of what ranting is and your level is even lower than stated above. You were not destined to come here and face all this... it was YOUR CHOICE. Regards N1197L (talk) 08:38, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]