User talk:Mr. Comodor
Hi, I've reverted your edits to issue because the text you added was a dictionary definition, which is not exactly why we're here. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 03:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Minor edit[edit]
As you can see here, I reverted your edit to the Judaism article. You changed a wording that was agreed upon a long time ago with cosiderable trouble.
But what worries me most is that you called it a minor edit!? Please do not make major edits and call them minor. Debresser (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- I now saw that you call all your edit moinor. You should not do so in the future. Minor edits are only spelling fixes or technical fixes and changes. Debresser (talk) 04:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit referencing Rubinstein's religion. As per that article's discussion page, the placement of the pianist's religious background was achieved by consensus. Also, you referred to that edit as minor: Minor edits, which are denoted by ticking the checkbox below the edit summary, are for spelling or grammatical tweaks, not changes in substance.THD3 (talk) 11:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Mr. Comodor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)