User talk:Miurasvjota
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Ferrari P article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to Ferrari P. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you! Bfpage |leave a message 01:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deli nk (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
We don't editorialize in articles. We do not put our own opinion and sign it in articles. Bgwhite (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- A friendly advice, my friend. Stop before it's too late; WP is not immune from uncivility and intolerance against unwelcome edits. Believe me, it happened to me. MinorStoop (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Ferrari P, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 12:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
ANI-notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 16:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
January 2017[edit]
Hello, I'm Dane. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ferrari P— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Dane talk 03:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I reverted some of your recent edits on Ferrari P. I am aware that you are personally knowledgeable on these cars, and I wanted to advise you of some core wikipedia policies so your edits can be constructive rather than disruptive. I will link the relevant wikipedia policies throughout my message so you can read more in depth. First of all, wikipedia relies on reliable sources. All information in an article must be cited by a reliable source, if not that information may be removed. These sources must be verifiable so that any editor can find the relevant source for the information being cited. As a result, wikipedia strictly forbids original research in articles. I understand that much of your edits regarding 0846 are based on personal correspondence you have had with Ing. Forghieri. This is considered original research according to wikipedia policies and therefore cannot be cited in an article. If this correspondence has been published in a reliable, netural source (i.e. reputable Ferrari history books, magazines or online publications), then it could be included in the article. However, it would have to be included by another editor, as you including your own published correspondence may be considered a violation of wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. I understand that the situation regarding chassis 0846 has been very contentious over the years, however the only way the article can improve in quality and coverage about this issue is to conform to wikipedia's longstanding policies on original research, reliable sources and netural point of view. Edits that only add original research and/or uncited statements will always be at risk of being reverted and are counterproductive. Additionally, "meta" discussion about other editors, talkpage discussions etc, should never be included in article text. See wikipedia policies on encyclopedic style and impartial tone for more guidance. I would like to support further improvement on the Ferrari P article and I'm happy to answer questions you might have about wikipedia policies. Prova MO (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |