User talk:MaxamillionSmart

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, MaxamillionSmart! Thank you for your contributions. I am Σούπερμαν and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Σούπερμαν (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Eileen Dietz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 01:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Eileen Dietz. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 01:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eileen Dietz with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 01:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was not vandalism. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Palpatine

added links pointing to Rick Baker and Star Wars: The Clone Wars (TV series)

Han Solo

added a link pointing to Keith Ferguson

Obi-Wan Kenobi

added a link pointing to Lewis Macleod

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Han Solo. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 17:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mickey Mouse. The information you are adding does not have a reliable source included, and another editor has raised questions about its notability in this article. Please discuss on the article talk page instead of adding it again. If it is added again after the time of this message, you will be reported for edit-warring. -- McDoob AU93 14:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hobbit (1977 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Óin and Ori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lorenzo's Oil. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JesseRafe (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lorenzo's Oil. JesseRafe (talk) 21:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Mel Brooks, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Hello M. Just so you know this edit summary is incorrect in several ways. A) I am not an admin B) I do not have a preference one way or another C) Even if I did the inclusion or removal needs to be discussed on the talk page. MarnetteD|Talk 20:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

What's up Max, listen, I'm just letting you know that I'm sorry for deleting your edits on the article yesterday, I just didn't understand of what was going on. I'm sorry. FrozenFan2 (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Link[edit]

Hey Max I was just wondering, can you show me the link of Allwine's marriges you found, because I really wanna see it and see what it looks like. FrozenFan2 (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to register on Ancestry.com to find them. MaxamillionSmart (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonic the Hedgehog (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Watanabe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cannibal! The Musical, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiny Tim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Given they myriad messages and warnings on your talk page above, it’s clear that you’re aware of the policy requiring the inclusion of reliable sources when adding biographical data to articles, especially biographies, so I’m unsure why you continue to do so at Stephanie Nadolny especially given that your previous attempt to add the same info was also reverted. Please also be aware of WP:OVERLINK which advises that common terms should not be linked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Tara Strong page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information again, as you did at Vegeta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 07:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit, recognized that it was similar to a vandal that I've been dealing with lately, and saw that your talk page was full of warnings for adding unsourced information to articles. Do you have a reliable source for your edit? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 19:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And why would you revert me and then blank the section? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 19:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of timelines[edit]

Your removal of Sonic character timelines [1] [2] [3] have been reverted as unexplained removal of useful information. In future, if you have a valid reason for removing content, then please write your reason(s) in an edit summary. Thanks, Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 06:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragon Ball Z: Broly – The Legendary Super Saiyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kent Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragon Ball Z: The World's Strongest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

If you continue to add unsourced personal information to biography articles and/or edit war to restore material removed as unsourced or not meeting the requirements of WP:BLPCAT, you will be blocked immediately and without further warning.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced personal information to biography articles despite many warnings and a final warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ceyli Delgadillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dende. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragon Ball Z: Lord Slug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitsuo Hashimoto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minnie Mouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shanghaied. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sandy Fox. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not change her birthday or real name. She has posted her full name on her own website, and her birthday is sourced by her website and news articles from the Orlando Sentinel. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued addition of unsourced personal information to biography articles despite a previous block for the same behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been logging out in order to skirt your current block, I have reset the clock on the block. It is back to two weeks as of today. You cannot edit under any account or IP while this block is in place.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As you continue to add the same unsourced content, even removing valid protection templates in the process, your block has been restored for one month. If you make logged out edits to evade your block, even once, I will change the block to indefinite.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Why do you keep reverting my edits, you didn't even check if they were right! You "restore" my block for a single month MaxamillionSmart (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also restored templates I removed BY ACCIDENT! And Wrath of the Dragon was released IN JA-PAN first! MaxamillionSmart (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because you don't support your changes with reliable sources, you don't communicate with editors expressing concerns, and you continue the same behaviour that led to your blocks every time they expire. Have you read any of the many messages on this page explaining why your edits are reverted and why you are being blocked?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about the source that I leave in the AB Groupe section of the casts? MaxamillionSmart (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since your block expired today:

revert to restore your unsourced contribution which includes a random letter 't' by the protection of the template

blanking of protection template and restoring unsourced information

restoring unsourced content

There are just three edits chosen at random. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is apparent that no amount of blocks or explanations will entice to you to use reliable sources when adding material to articles. You continue to add information based on your own personal knowledge (who is "we"?) or forum posts without regard to previous blocks for the same edits. The block is for an indefinite duration this time, that is you are blocked until you are able to convinced a reviewing admin that you understand why you are blocked and why your edits are unacceptable.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What gives!? Ponyo, you're just a trigger-happy savage! MaxamillionSmart (talk) 03:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, MaxamillionSmart. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]