User talk:Manisero399
Image copyright problem with Image:275px-Astrological Glyphs svg copia.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:275px-Astrological Glyphs svg copia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Using non-english sources[edit]
Regarding the sources you provided on Planets in astrology#Ceres, please note that English Wikipedia policy asks that you quote the source and translate it. Please read about WP:RSUE. Thanks, --Nate (talk) 02:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Can you please quote a phrase or two of what she says about it in the book? Most of us will not be able to get a hold of this book. --Nate (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
RE:Ceres[edit]
I can understand from the mythology why you'd think Ceres should be attributed to Virgo, but personally I'm not for it. The asteroid is too concerned with having, possessing which seems more Taurus to me and not mental or holistic enough. My personal favorite is Pallas, even though for some reason everyone seems to have overlooked it. It's mental, dexterious, a healer, a helper [1]. At any rate, I deleted Ceres the first time in the Domicile article because if you do a little research you'll see almost every other astrologer is using a different ruler for Virgo and there's probably never going to be a complete agreement. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Cease and desist[edit]
I disagree with some or many of your astrological views, but I respect your right to disagree with me and understand your enthusiasm in trying to assign a new ruler to Virgo. But you can't force your opinions on Wikipedia! You can't go around deleting information on conflicting views, it violates policy and doesn't cast you in good light either. Please be considerate of others and follow policy and etiquette guidelines more strictly.
Policy aside as one astrologer to another, you put too much emphasis on labels like 'planet'. The "dwarf planet" category was decided on by only 400 people and labels don't magically change, elevate or lower what a planet does or how much attention it deserves. Is a satellite (Moon) less important than a dwarf planet that's smaller than it (Pluto)? Ceres is not right for or deserving of Virgo in my opinion, even the mythology is wrong. --IdLoveOne (talk) 23:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for finally replying. The only thing about the Ceres mythology that sounds Virgo-like is "agricultural woman," but that's the end of it (the mom thing is pretty Cancer-like), I don't think your friends have thought very far at all. The Pluto connection is even stronger "proof" of the connection with Taurus, as this is the modern ruler of the sign opposite of Taurus, who weakened her -- detriment. If you think about it, the mythology implies that Ceres would hate Virgo, because the mythology is that Ceres became extremely depressed at the time of the harvest when Persephone was kidnapped and forced back to Hell every year, however in spring (Taurus is a spring sign) she was happy because Persephone was freed. So happy that she brought back all the Earth's greenery. But what I really don't like about Ceres for Virgo is that it's not a cerebral planet, which is what Virgo needs: A brainy, mentally-nervous, shy, health-conscious worker ruler, such as Pallas (almost perfect), Vesta or Chiron. This is not the nature of Ceres. Ceres does not rule Virgo and I don't care if they promote it to super-greatest-aster-solar system body-deserves-its-own-universe planet. Virgo is a sign of discernment, as so, Virgo must pick the correct ruler and for the correct reasons, not hype.
- Also, size doesn't matter. No one's replacing Pluto with Eris, and with good reason, so I just don't care that Ceres is the biggest asteroid (Pallas and Vesta are 2nd and third, good enough for me). Though, it might be a nice idea to give Earth to Taurus, if we can figure out a proper way to add it to astrology, but I think Ceres is a fair fit, better that sign than Virgo anyway. --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Pluto2.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Pluto2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Asteroid glyphs.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Planets in astrology glyphs.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:The-astrological-glyphs.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Astrological-glyphs editado-1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)