User talk:Malcanthet

Demon lords[edit]

Hi. Would you please start adding reference sections & infoboxes to the new articles you create? Thanks, you'll be saving me a lot of time.--Robbstrd 20:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, adding categories & project templates would also be much appreciated.--Robbstrd 20:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all a matter of copying & pasting, really. Being lazy is a pretty crappy excuse, & doesn't earn you any favors with your fellow Wikipedians.--Robbstrd 20:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, you're only interested in doing a half-assed job? You may want to think twice about editing altogether. Geez, all I'm asking for is a little copying & pasting.--Robbstrd 21:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"A half-assed job is better than none at all. You know, perhaps I shouldn't be bothered with this either. Malcanthet 02:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)" Not if people have to clean up your messes.

Ahazu[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ahazu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.133.110.41 14:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ilsidahur. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 00:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zuggtmoy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 00:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kostchtchie, you will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Yeenoghu, you will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl 00:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

I hope that you've calmed down now. Having read your blanked discussion page, I'm guessing you may have reacted in anger to the combined stress of dealing with some guy who was a jerk to you and with having an article tagged for speedy deletion. Both of those things would sting me, too. Or maybe it was something else entirely. But whatever's going on, it's not worth trying to deface everything. You've done a lot of good work on Wikipedia, and Wikipedia doesn't need to lose you. As a fellow D&D player, I'm impressed by what you've done. Moonriddengirl 00:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleting your own contributions[edit]

But we don't own our articles once we release them on Wikipedia--that is, we retain copyright of what we've written, but the terms we agree to puts it out there to be edited and used by others. If you're the only contributor to an article and want it deleted, you can request that. (In fact, blanking your own article is considered a request for speedy deletion.) Once it's been contributed to by anyone else, it's common ground and mass text deletions become vandalism. I can see that you've started a lot of articles--certainly more than I have, though I've done a few. They look like good articles. Wikipedia has a broad audience that will appreciate them. Moonriddengirl 00:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. so sayeth Lucky Number 49 ^{Yell at me!} 01:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Your" work on Wikipedia does not actually belong to you. What you're doing is considered vandalism. Read the policies.--Robbstrd 00:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Fraz-Urb'luu, you will be blocked from editing. VegitaU 23:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons), you will be blocked from editing. VegitaU 23:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alison ☺ 23:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DAMN! What does it take to make it permenant?!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malcanthet (talk • contribs) 2007-08-08

Heh. Isn't it easier just to quit than to strive for an indef block? If that's what you want, I'm sure it can be arranged... :) Actually you can probably make the request yourself by reporting yourself to WP:AIV. -Amatulic 01:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Adimarchus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Turaglas[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Turaglas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turaglas. Thank you. Gavin Collins 13:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lynkhab[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lynkhab, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynkhab. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lynkhab for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynkhab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynkhab (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 00:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kerzit for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerzit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerzit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rhyxali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhyxali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhyxali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Queen of Chaos[edit]

The article Queen of Chaos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Verin (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

The article Verin (Dungeons & Dragons) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shami-Amourae[edit]

The article Shami-Amourae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]