User talk:Levan Gwerin

December 2018

Hello, I'm Prolog. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Great Replacement conspiracy theory have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Prolog (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Response

Hi Prolog, I don’t know who’s entitled to decide what is “constructive” and what is not?

The Oxford dicitionary defines a conspiracy theory as follows: “A belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event”. Neither of the two theorists, Jean and Renaud, respectively, have purported that “a great replacement” is being covertly orchestrated by some hidden cabal. In fact, the contrary is true. They say that mass migration is openly advocated for by UN treaties as well as EU policies (which is objectively true when you examine the wording of the Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Reugalr Migration). The criticism levied against the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum as a tool facilitating replacement migration is also objectively legitimate.

Now I don’t expect you to reinstate my edits, because based on the other comments users have made about your censorship campaign, you clearly have an ideological agenda to uphold, and I’m sure you won’t be letting the truth get in the way of that now will you.

Regards

Levan Levan Gwerin (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

All content in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to reliable sources. That includes "The Truth". Prolog (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)