User talk:Lenosy

Welcome!

Hello, Lenosy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Suicide of Jared High, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Timneu22 · talk 17:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suicide of Jared High[edit]

The article Suicide of Jared High has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Timneu22 · talk 17:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lenosy, I'm afraid that article had to go due to its sourcing and to an extent its slant. Wikipedia is not censored and we do cover some very controversial topics but we are neither a primary source nor a secondary source. If you are going to write here it is important to understand how to use WP:Reliable sources such as newspapers. Articles sourced from one side of a dispute are almost bound to have neutrality problems. Ϣere SpielChequers 22:03, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced BLP violations[edit]

Hi, this edit is a violation of our biographies of living people policy. I have reverted it. Can you provide sources to substantiate that? If not, I will need to suppress it as libelous. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've suppressed that edit. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Samantha Kelly suicide article[edit]

Hello Lenosy. I've deleted the article as a recent suicide of a child is a particularly sensitive subject and per WP:NOTNEWS. ("Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion... While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information.") If you disagree with this, you can contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review or let me know on my talk page. Regards, --KFP (contact | edits) 14:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Be True To Your Fool[edit]

The article Be True To Your Fool has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable episode of King of the Hill; does not establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AerobicFox (talk) 23:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brandon Melendez for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Melendez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Melendez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TreyGeek (talk) 01:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]