User talk:Legolas2186/Archive 34

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 30

←

Archive 32

→

Talkback

Hello, Legolas2186. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 14:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dabomb87 (talk) 14:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi, can you close the peer review of List of awards and nominations received by Kamal Haasan. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 08:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks like you were busy all these days. Can you close the peer review. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 14:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done, sorry I missed this section amongst all the new ones. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Characters of Parks and Recreation

Hey Legolas, how's it going. I saw that you've done some reviews at WP:FLC and was hoping to seek your advice. I've been doing some pretty extensive work on Characters of Parks and Recreation for the last few days, and I think it's nearly ready to be nominated for featured list. However, while I've done several FAs in the past I've never really done an FL, so I was hoping you guys could give me some advice on whether you feel it is ready before I go ahead with it. I plan on reading through the article once or twice more for a grammatical copy edit and to possibly tighten the prose in some areas, but I think the substance of it is mostly complete. I'm not asking for an extensive review or anything, just a glance to see if it looks generally up to par. Let me know, if you get the time. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 16:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

At first glance, the list appears really exhaustive, well brilliant. Main issue which I can see is the alignment of the images, which I feel appears very haphazard. Some images are breaking into the next section, making the image pertaining to the character in the next section, move further down. The usage of the {{double image}} template appears humorously squeezed, because one of the image is too wide, and one, too narrow. Try to crop the wider image. The last one, that of Fred Armison needs to be somehow moved, 'cause its squeezing the references, although you are using the col-4 width. And I checked in the widest of resolutions possible. These are my main qualms, spotchecks not done. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the fast response! As per your comments, I have replaced the non-free image with a compilation of licensed pictures of the cast which I cropped myself. I based this on the American Beauty one you directed me to, but please let me know if I did anything wrong. As far as the alignment of the images, I've removed some images so there will be less overlap (including the one of Fred Armisen that was messing up the references), but given that the sections are so short, it seems to me it's unavoidable that there will be some images running over into other sections, at least on computers with very high resolution. Unless you can think of anything else I could do? — Hun ter Ka hn 23:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow, it looks so much better now Hunter! Good job. One thing, just try to see you don't have images overlapping two-level sections, like the pic of Alison. Other pictures are fine. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Just a note to say hi

Hi, thank you for not reverting my edit done for MAD. Actually I have done the similar "cosmetic" change on MCAD, but it didn't meet a happy end. Though I pretty believe it'd actually help the article as (s)well. Well, never mind, and you enjoy the wk/e. Uzerakount (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Words

User:Dr pda/prosesize is very handy. If you don't wanna install the script, just enter javascript:importScript('User:Dr pda/prosesize.js'); getDocumentSize(); into the address bar. If this is for DYK, remember that expansion is based on character count, not word count. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Just misses the mark. What was 11k prose is now 53k. :-( Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Maybe your browser just sucks. Try installing the script in your custom skin. My preferences>Appearance>Custom Javascript for whatever skin you're using, then add {{subst:js|User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js}}. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Prose size (text only)/"readable prose size". Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Like a Prayer (song)

On 9 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Like a Prayer (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pepsi allowed Madonna to retain her $5 million dollar fee, despite cancelling their sponsorship deal following the controversy over the music video for "Like a Prayer"? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: archiving script

Maybe- how good are you at programming? :) It's a python script I run on my own computer; the setup isn't user-friendly. --Pres N 16:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

References

Dear Legolas2186,

I just noticed that the Born This Way and Vogue articles have numerous bare references, which are not using the cite web format. I have no idea how to do this. Would it be possibly if you could format them for me, as you said you would do on the Born This Way talk page?

Yours,

--&レア (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Theologiae, 5-6 reference formatting is fine, but to format a whole lot of references is not something I signed for. Lets see what reftools say. And I did tell you, read {{cite web}} and then see how that template is used in an article. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, of course, I just read the article on formatting references and I realise it's a heavier job than I imagined. I'll try to do some myself, but if you could help me to do some as well, I would appreciate that immensely.

Yours,

--&レア (talk) 08:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Do you have OTRS account?

I need a favor. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry Axl, I don't have. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Too bad. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Ask Stifle (talk · contribs) or Sandstein (talk · contribs), they are prompt in their reply. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, I asked another user whose username I'll reserve to avoid him/her problems. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok, I hope everything is fine. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

For now yes, but you know I'm a rebel guy. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh thats why you wanted to see the ticket. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, 9/10 (if not 10/10) non-lawyers will agree that that logotype consists only of public domain information. If this is not copyrighted, IOC logo neither. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion...

(By anyone who reads this) on what else to include under background on User:(CK)Lakeshade/Sandbox8 :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

LMAO! That's the name of the second album? Why haven't I heard this name? As for the background section, nothing more. You have summarized the lead point to Cannibal fairly well, anything more is gross WP:UNDUE. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Sweet awesome, i hate background on albums one of my weakest points when writing. And thats the "rumored" title for it; she said straight up in an interview with Beatweek Magazine shes calling it this, the reviewer thought she was joking and she was like "im not kidding, thats seriously the name of it"... so unless she changes it thats the title lmao, pretty awesome in my opinion. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

He he, this is soooo going to smash! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

It better, this will define her career if she'll be a one album wonder or if shes going to be around for awhile. As long as shes got Luke im not too worried. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Ya Luke will have the staple songs that will surely set the chart on fire. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Who's That Girl

The article is too long, too pov and clearly a vanity piece by madonna fans. I have started a discussion and a less dramatic culling. As this film bombed it can't be a platform to explain why it should not or could have been better. The detail is excessive, needless and belongs on a madonna website not on wikipedia. Catherine Huebscher (talk) 12:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Characters of Parks and Recreation image

An editor has twice replaced my Characters of Parks and Recreation photo collage with the original non-free image. Perhaps you'd like to weigh in on this as the talk page discussion I started. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 04:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

I replied there, seriously I'm waiting for his/her rationale as to why the NF image passes NFCC. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Are you sure the "dynamic list" tag is really necessary? I see that other FLs for shows that are still airing (like List of Family Guy cast members, List of cast members of The Simpsons, List of 30 Rock episodes) don't have such a tag, nor do FAs for subjects like ongoing shows (The Simpsons) or living people (Barack Obama, Brad Pitt). I get the concept that the list is going to continue to be revised until the show ends, but I just fear that the tag will give the impression that the list is not stable or is somehow incomplete. — Hun ter Ka hn 14:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

The list is indeed incomplete, and P&R being a new show, compared to the other examples that you gave, is going to be radically changing per season. For bio articles there is no need of the tag, because it is known where the bio article will end, with the death of the person usually (unless you are Michael Jackson and your money-craving nitwit brothers use your attribution for more moolah!) It wasn't long when me and the FL delegates were discussing that whether it was better to add the {{dynamic list}} tag to all the ongoing season lists, character lists and the award lists. So to conclude, lists where a stability is achieved (like Simpsons, Family Guy, Friends etc), there the template might not be necessary since things are not going to be radically different in future, but new lists do require it. Hell even List of awards and nominations received by Madonna, a very recently promoted list, features the template, and Madonna is over 30 years into her career. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

U2 360° Tour Gross

U2 have indeed grossed $659! I think you might have missed last weeks boxscores:

U2, Lenny Kravitz Angel Stadium of Anaheim Anaheim, Calif. June 17-18, 2011 $10,790,140 105,955 / 105,955 2 / 2 $250, $30 Live Nation Global Touring

U2, Florence + the Machine M&T Bank Stadium Baltimore, Md. June 22, 2011 $6,832,510 74,557 / 74,557 1 / 1 $250, $30 Live Nation Global Touring

U2, Lenny Kravitz Qwest Field Seattle, Wash. June 4, 2011 $6,118,785 69,439 / 69,439 1 / 1 $250, $30 Live Nation Global Touring

U2, Lenny Kravitz, Moonalice O.co Coliseum Oakland, Calif. June 7, 2011 $6,075,895 64,829 / 64,829 1 / 1 $250, $30 Live Nation Global Touring

U2, Florence + the Machine Spartan Stadium East Lansing, Mich. June 26, 2011 $5,064,980 63,824 / 63,824 1 / 1 $250, $30 Live Nation Global Touring — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.48.71.77 (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

All good, but you forgot the part where you are supposed to cite a source for your additions. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Cannibal

Might we get your third opinion here?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Also it occurs to me that no one has bothered to say anything about my post at Talk:Lady Gaga discography.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Replied in your talk page. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

ArchAndroid GA and Madonna American Life

Thanks for being so patient with the ArchAndroid nomination, I think I have covered everything in the review. Just wondering if you have had a chance to look at the American Life article in my sandbox, I am struggling to do much more with it, if you would like to take it on, I would be very happy to give you what I have started. Thanks --FeuDeJoie (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Will look it up shortly. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Case

All right fine i’ll admit it i’m ElpilotoDi and yes I did upload all those picture. I’m a huge madonna fan and I wanted to post those pictures because they’re HQ and Look better, and I recognize i wanted to do everything to post them and I admit The way i uploaded those pictures was wrong but I decided to do it the right way now and if you give me another chance i’ll promise you Won’t regret it. I’ll do things the right way now and maybe you, another big Madonna fan could help me do Things the right way. I decided to not upload anymore pictures of any kind. Pleas eplease think about it.--MindyHall (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

You should have thought about it better. I'm sorry but this is out of my hands now. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Atlanta Braves team records/archive1

RE at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Atlanta Braves team records/archive1. Albacore (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Will answer there shortly. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Eh...

Kinda lost interest in the project tbh. I survey things every now and then and fix some stuff here and there, but for the most part I'm pretty inactive. Maybe I'll get back into it, maybe I won't. I haven't decided. –Chase (talk / contribs) 06:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I really like it. It's her best album yet imo, but The Fame Monster is a very close second. –Chase (talk / contribs) 06:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

"Marry the Night" is the best track IMO. I hope that's the fourth single. –Chase (talk / contribs) 06:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Mary J. Blige is a great B stan

Hi Legolas. I hope you are even better now. See www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=80903&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=7225

I cannot believe so many female singers bought 4. I do not know most of them. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Lol, Jivesh most of them, except Rihanna and Keri Hilson are celebrity impersonaters. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I take that back. They are so fake!!! LMAO!! UKmix is the best! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Rihanna as well? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that's a super-imposed picture of 4 on the other artist's albums. Receipt? None of them have that hair-style now. Rihanna's blond mushroom hair-style is colored orange here with photoshop. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Plus, I don't think Britney looks that pretty now. Hilson's hair style has changed too. Novice7 (talk) 06:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Legolas you are really clever. Someone on that page wrote the same thing. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Huh? Someone talked about me there? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

No silly. Actually, the wrote practically the same thing as you. That means you analyse things very well. Did you know that many Wikipedia editors are on UKMIX? I am so sad i got banned. I cannot create another account. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Jivesh, you wouldn't have been able to handle the shade that gets thrown there. You would have eventually burst into anger again, and would have got banned anyways. You are not really missing anything. I deleted my account from there long ago. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

So you were also there. Actually they used to provide amazing sources for sales. and they were all reliable although i never heard of them before. Lol. And to tell you frankly, that whole crew of B stans was like a family of which i was a member. The only thing i really miss are the amazing sources they gave (only when i asked) about the sales of 4. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I just take the laughs out of it now, dont really care for any forums now. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Have heard the latest radio updates? "Motivation" has been getting +2 million radio updates since the last two days. And guess what, its AI was decreasing before these two days. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Z100 added it to their power-play list. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Ahhhh Okay. And any news about BTINH? Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Same old, same old, STeady +1.2million updates in airplay, but sales not moving. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I just learnt that "Sweet Dreams" had over 100 million AI. Wow. I think that it is impressive for a song not being a hit on iTunes. BTINH is fixed at 20 on iTunes. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

"Sweet Dreams" and "Paparazzi" moved side by side to the top, with Papa ultimately reaching #1, SD stopping at #5 I think. That was such a wonderful thing to see them together moving up. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

No. Gaga stopped at 1 while SD stopped at 2. That's even wonderful. I saw that on UK-mix and verified it in billboard archives. That was really nice. I agree. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

My mom is crazy about that GaGa song. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Is he a man? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, thats actually a man's face super-imposed on a woman's body. I really love this parody, it kills the "holy crap of disrespectful fuck" outta me!! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Needless to say i did not understand the last part of your message. Lol. It was really funny. I am happy that's a woman because for a while i began thinking: "how can a man have such a body?" Lol. I have to get back to revision now. Bye. See you soon. Till then, take care. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Bio and FA

Hi Legolas! I have a question. I have with me a few Whitney biographies. Two of them are titled Unauthorized (!) I was wondering if the FA reviewers would question its reliability as it's unauthorized? Novice7 (talk) 15:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

They might actually. But if its by a reputed author then its fine. Hardly there are artists who authorize biographies. For eg: I use Madonna by Andrew Morton, which, although unauthorized, can be used due to the reliability of the author in question. So try to search the reliability of the author first. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

One is James Robert Parish and the other is Jefferey Bowman... Novice7 (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

James Robert Parish is really reliable. Don't know the other person though. That's what, try to find out what kind of reviews the other person's bok got, from there you can construct the reliability of his additions. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 04:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

User

Thanks for looking into the disruption and that biased user. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Mhmmm, hes been indef blocked (in case you didnt notice) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Of course I have, I raised that WP:AN3 report. :D — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:31, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Hahah, i really dont pay attention after i report someone; i noticed like a week later they were blocked :P - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

SunCreator

I have enough with this guy. He continues to refuse to get the point, and continue with the same. I and Andrew explained him in simple English that he is wrong, could you speak him in Advanced English please? Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I notified the FAC delegates of him, and this douchebaggery. My advance English I can tell, but I don't wanna cause any hamper to the FAC of Halo. Karanacs is a fair delegate and she will look into this. Such opposes won't be considered valid. Axl you just leave a note in the FAC page that you "don't find his comments actionable per WP:IDHT." — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: One Question

Sure. What's up? — Hun ter Ka hn 13:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, at a very quick glance, it certainly looks like FA material to me. It appears to be comprehensive, everything is cited, and the sources appear reliable. Although I'm sure somebody will inevitably question the non-free images, they both seem fine to me (the music video and the infobox pic). I haven't read it but it seems well-written, and my quick spot-check on a few of the references seemed fine. I'd say go for it! (If you want me to do a more thorough, top-to-bottom look at the article, let me know. Or, if and when you nominate it for FA, let me know and I'll review it proper there.) — Hun ter Ka hn 13:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

FLC

I have improved the list to some extent. Waiting for your comments. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 06:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Can you have a look at the list now. Improved a lot. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 04:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Seili

Hi, about my edit.[1] The explicit source[2] says "multi-platinum" though the IFPI page[3] that deals with the limits lists the limits "gold, platinum, double-platinum, triple-platinum etc." I had this same discussion some while ago about whether we categorize albums to "gold", "platinum", "double-platinum" and "double or more" and we (have already forgot who plus me) ended up on that compromise. If you want that to be changed, start the conversation for example here. -- Frous (talk) 22:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Billboard Boxscore

I'm sure you know about billboard.biz having their archives free until tomorrow, how do I use the Billboard Boxscore? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan FL

Hi, I am almost done with the list. Eagerly waiting for your comments. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 17:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Dude, I will comment before the FLC closes. You don't have to remind me everyday, I'm saying this in the nicest way possible. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Can you do me two huge favours? I need a picture of Rihanna and Eminem at the Grammy's performing LTWYL Pt. 2 and an audio sample of LTWYL Pt. 2. I don't know how to add them and make the meet rationale, could you help me out by uploading them please? Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 22:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I can make you the audio sample if you tell me what part of the song. However, I have an issue that I'd like Avi's opinion on actually. I think it should really be merged to the original LTWYL page. It is less than a cover, a remake, I think like all covers of similar articles, there should be a discussion over this. Opinions?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Novice7 or Petergriffin9901 has the software to upload the sample, as for the image, it will never pass WP:NFCC since it is the performing image of two living people. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

What is your opinion regarding the discussed merge?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 04:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Dpends on whether we can consider it as a cover or alternate version. Cover versions should be merged together, alternate versions can stand on their own, if they are separately released. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, I mean I guess they all are alternate versions. I mean, Carey's IWTKWLI may be a cover, but makes no use of a complete verse, changes the instrumentation, production and everything. So its hard to decide what is the difference. What do you personally think?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 04:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Lego. Covers (eg Still in Love (Kissing You)) should be in the same article (despite modifications to the song), whereas alternative versions (eg Love in This Club Part II) should be separate articles. Naturally, there are probably some exceptions. Depends on the amount of content. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Ada + Also, IWKWLI is still the same song, with minor re-arrangements, while LTWYLPII actually takes the same melody and chord progression, but has completely different verses. Songs can have the same chord and melody and can stand as different versions. If that were not the case, we would be seeing "Born This Way" being merged to "Express Yourself". — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

How come you can't have an image of two living people? There is on of Rihanna and Eminem on the Love the Way You Lie article? And I am against merging Part 2 with the original. It's not a cover version, why would Eminem and Rihanna ocver their own song? It's completely different to the original. It's kinda like saying that Empire State of Mind Part 2 (Broken Down) is a cover of Empire State of Mind, when they are so different. Also against it being merged because it was only just made GA this morning lol. Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 12:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

(->)You can't have a "non-free" image of two living people, rather any living people. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

chord

Hi Avi, can you give me the chord progression for Say Somethin'? Thanks :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Emaj7 to Amaj7 with Bminor added in chorus. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Award

Thank you for giving me that Editor's Barnstar award. Thank you. Ashishvats23 (talk) 08:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

ha, bol sakta hu.Ashishvats23 (talk) , 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Aap kha se ho. main delhi se hu (pitam pura). Ashishvats23 (talk) , 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Lmao

Saw this? Novice7 (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

That guy deserves this eggs and not Gaga. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Lol, that's funny. Good thing you tagged it. I was about to, but got lost in music lol :D Novice7 (talk) 07:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry got late in a morning brunch. Starting my famed lifestyle all over again! LMAO! What did it have? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

See filter log. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Enthiran reassessment

Hi, I agree that the article was not stable, but other than that in what way do you think "the article is far from being the level article that we expect in GA" --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 07:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Stability is a big big factor in GA, plus the amount of fancruft and unreliable sources added in the article, this is not GA quality. The review was a big indication of the immaturity of the reviewer, when he/she passed it even when Fae pointed out the gross instability of the article. And I fucking hate people who bring communal disputes into an encyclopedia, the way some folks have been going loggerheads at the talk page. Do you think I 'm only immersed in music world? No my friend, I have noticed each and every comment from all those who contributed, the so called "Hindi" and "Tamil" folks. I'm ashamed for all of you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

To be very honest, I did not contribute much to the article. I guess, I made my first edit to the article only after it passed GA. The reviewer said, "I was very lenient", so don't criticize any reviewer. This happens in every film articles especially Tamil films. The same problem existed in Dasavathaaram too. Infact a lot of Tamil people (Kamal Haasan fans) were against this article rather than the Hindi-speaking people. A lot of unreliable sources and unnecessary stuff were added only after it passed GA. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 07:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm not blaming you indivitually or anything. My point is why the hell would this same scenario be repeated for every film article, albeit the ones in Tamil and Hindi? Is Wikipedia a communal zone to lobby your own culture or your own stars? And btw, I am criticizing the reviewer's review, not him/her. This is exactly the same reason I was disgusted to develop these articles. Even if a lot of unreliable sources etc were added, why wasn't it removed rather than kept? Edit warring? Admins could have been easily notified at WP:AN3 of those users insisting on adding fancruft and they are prompt in taking action. Look at what happened to that troll who made comments about unbiased info and made legal threats to Fae. You are a wonderful editor who is trying to develop the articles, but the hostility and the personal attacks and fancruft going on in that zone is just un–believable. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Regarding personal attacks, I saw these kind of attacks mainly after the arrival of this user. He started editing just before a month, but looked like an old-hand. He was totally against this film (and was prmoting telugu films on the other hand) and was making personal attacks against everyone. He even termed three users (including me) as "Vandalising criminals" on more than ten talk pages and was indef blocked. After the start of the start of reassessment phase he had left WP. He was involved in constant edit-wars almost all the time he spent here. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 08:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Seems like a case of chickening out after block. Many users, who make personal attacks and get blocked for it, later cease to edit even after getting unblocked. Anyways, he/she seems to have learned a lesson. But still, there will be a downpour of users who make these kind of heinous edits to turn a perfectly logical and comprehensive article into a fancruft. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

heyaa

Are these three pictures allowed and meet rationale? Footprints in the Sand Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 14:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Of course because they are free images and are not under WP:NFCC. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay thanks. Also, should album articles have a release history in the form of a wiki chart? Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 15:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki chart? I did not get what you are asking. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

like this Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 15:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

It is advised to have it if you have proper sources, but don't bold the country names. Excuse me Calvin, a little busy here. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Born This Way

I am well aware that you are not the only one who edits the Born This Way article, but god damn, it is stunning! AMAZING WORK! ℥^nding·start 07:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Really? I still think its C-class. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Whaaatt? I'm surprised it hasn't been nominated for GA yet! Crystal Clear x3 08:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm really surprised! Are you guys really seeing the same article I'm seeing? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Avi guys. Guys, thanks and congrats are due when they are due, AKA "Like a Prayer", but BTW is barely C-class. True it holds a lot of information, but the article suffers from NPOV issues, sever prose damage, improperly formatted references and just a general lack of flow or anything of that matter. The song article is great though!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh shh your mouth! I read the article up and down and it was a great read! ℥^nding·start 05:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Noooooooooooo (like Voldemort). Its my birthday today I can speak whateva I want!!! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

End of Time

Hi Lego. How are you? I need an advice. Which part of "End of Time" is best to be uploaded? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

The chorus? I always found it to be the most discussed part. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Legolas. I think you mean the "come take my hand" part. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Is it too early to publish this? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

As a song its fine, but as a single its wayyyyy too premature. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay Legolas. Thank you again. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

If there is no source stating the genre of "End of Time", what should i do? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Can you please copy-edit the lead only? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

erghhh

why hasn't the GA code worked on the B'Day talk page! lol. Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 22:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

GimmeBot doesn't update pages instantly, give it some time. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Look what we have here

HAPPY BIRTHDAY! :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanky do! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

जन्मदिन मुबारक हो! ജന്മദിനാശംസകള്‍! শুভ জন্মদিন! feliz cumpleaños! Happy Birthday! Novice7 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

OMG, the things ya'all do, makes me so happy! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

お誕生日おめでとう。(not a native language of mine, but blame Novice for making English seem inadequate). How do you like your cake? —Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

He he. And ya, I love the cake, 7 candles!! Reminds me of HPADHP2. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Haven't had the chance to catch that yet, although half of my city was at the midnight premieres... does it live up to the suspense of P1? —Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

This one is just out and out war, no mushy scenes that much. But a fitting ending I must say, especially the grown-up scene 19 years later. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday grandpa ;P--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 06:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

(lol above) Is it your birthday? I think I have to remember when all of you have your date. The main question is, why are you here!!!! go and celebrate your day. Congratulations here's a cake in my native language. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Grrr, its raining here. My friends were gonna take me and my wife on a Saturday brunch, then it was off to our club house for a party, but I'm still stuck here. Might just well check my mails, wiki, FB etc. Thanks to all of you, ya'all are invited here. Getchur passport, grab a rexin, get hold of your LV bags and getchur ass to India! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy birthday. --Efe (talk) 06:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Gee thanks Mark! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Process a passport in Mexico? I'm going to be 22 before it happens. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Shall we pass "Prayer" as FA? hehe --Efe (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy birthday buddy!! Hope you have a great day! :) ℥^nding·start 06:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Lol. Lego, send me a cheque and I'll be on the next plane. :P —Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Lol, you will be the second foreign Wikipedian I meet. Thanks Zach too. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy birthday Legooo! :) Xwomanizerx (talk) 07:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

OMG Legolas, happy birthday!!!! Hope your okay, and have a great day!!! (I just realize that today I will be four years on wiki :S) By the way, can I go to India? Im in the middle of winter here, and its freezing cold!!! I already have a passport :D Frcm1988 (talk) 07:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Legolas! Hope you have an awesome day! Thanks for being such an awesome person and editor!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 07:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Xwoma, thanks Christopher, thanks Blackjackdaniels!!! You guys are all so kind. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

You and I are fellow Cancers - my b.d. was July 9. Happy birthday! --David Shankbone 07:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks David, and a belated happy birthday to you too :) — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy birthday! BTW, I am a cancer, too :).--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫_{Share–a–Power}^{[citation needed]} 14:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy B-day to one of Wiki's finest!

Lots of best wishes!! Crystal Clear x3 10:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks girl! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Definately one of Wiki's finest indeed. Happy Birthday! WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN ^(♫♫) 14:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)