User talk:Latha P Nair

..

Relevance of link[edit]

What is the relevance of Comparison of office suites to CEO (Data General)? The linked article is a comparison of current office software; it doesn't mention CEO, because CEO is long defunct.-gadfium 08:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Office comparison[edit]

Is there a reason you're inserting the Comparison of office suites in dozens of unrelated articles? Kuru ^talk 12:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, less subtle: please stop inserting this link into completely unrelated articles. It's beginning to look promotional. Thanks. Kuru ^talk 13:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed many of the links you have placed, because you have not shown how they are relevant to the articles.-gadfium 18:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add these links without discussing why you believe they are relevant, you may be blocked from editing as a disruptive editor.-gadfium 08:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised the matter at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Latha P Nair. Please contribute to the discussion there.-gadfium 22:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding! Please stop with the nonsense linking! +mt 06:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you until such time as you are willing to explain your edits.-gadfium 08:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason of linking the Comparison of office suites into CEO (Data General) is it will be very useful to the CEO's to function their office work using Office Suites.Latha P Nair (talk) 08:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean you aren't reading the articles before adding the link. Your comment suggests you still haven't read this one. In any case, there are lots of articles which may be interesting for a CEO or anyone else to read, but that is not a justification for putting links on the articles of unrelated topics.-gadfium 18:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]