User talk:Ksinkar

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ksinkar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , Hu Gadarn 15:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Fraley[edit]

Hello Ksinkar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Robert Fraley for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fatima Convent High School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fatima Convent High School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fatima Convent High School[edit]

Hello, Ksinkar. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fatima Convent High School".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 14:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fatima Convent High School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fatima Convent High School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old Gujarati vs Gurjar Apabhransh[edit]

Hi, I saw your edit on Old Gujarati. However, I think it's important to note the distinction between Old Gujarati and the Gurjar Apabhransh that preceded it. The apabhransh as described by Acharya Hemachandra is was spoken after the disintegration of Shauraseni Prakrit into its various apabhranshes: Gurjar ap., Shauraseni ap., perhaps Vrachad, and maybe a few more that we currently don't know of. Shauraseni Prakrit almost certainly ceased to be spoken by around the 10th century (and probably much earlier), and Acharya Hemachandra's apabhransh was one of the descendents. I think we both agree on all of that. However, that apabhransh is notably different from the Old Gujarati of the phagus (esp vasantavilas) and other literature (like રણમલ્લછંદ) of the 1300s-1500s. This language, also known in the literature as Old Western Rajasthani, split into Gujarati, Marwadi, and the rest of the Rajasthani languages (like Malvi, Mewadi, etc.). Additionally, the literature (by Indians and non-Indians) supports the distinction between Acharya Hemachandra's apabhransh and Old Gujarati. Please tell me if you have any disagreements with anything above. Smettems (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]