User talk:JonMoseley

Welcome!

Hello JonMoseley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Luna Santin 04:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please bear in mind key content policies including verifiability, neutral point of view, and no original research. Please also note that edit warring is strongly frowned upon -- I encourage you to discuss your edits with other users instead of battling against them. Luna Santin 04:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Luna Santin 04:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regnery Publishing[edit]

Per the above, you have been blocked for 12 hours -- Samir धर्म 05:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per your e-mails, I refer you to [1] and to WP:3RR -- Samir धर्म 06:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --TeaDrinker 04:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use sock puppets to circumvent the three revert rule. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 04:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your email[edit]

Thanks for the note via email. I note that you seem to be replying to a message left on the talk page of User:JackMcGuire. I presume that you and he are the same editor. There have been two replies to the discussion you started on the talk page, see Talk:Global_warming#MANIFESTLY_FALSE_STATEMENTS. Feel free to continue the discussion there. For past discussions, read through the archive (see the box to the right of the table of contents). I would argue, and I think it is fair characterization given the number of editors who have reverted your work in the article, that your edits are controversial. Controversial edits should be discussed on the talk page before being added to the article. Please don't feel we are trying to marginalize you. The global warming article has been well reviewed and researched, attaining featured article status (the very best of Wikipedia--attained by a fraction of a percent of articles at present). Major changes are likely to be thoughly discussed. Thanks for the time and effort. In future, it is probably faster to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks again, --TeaDrinker 05:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your e-mail[edit]

With regards to your dispute with User:Raul654, please see Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. I'm just an admin, and most admins do not have the power to "remove authority". There are a small number Stewards who do but they will likely ignore such requests unless the steps are followed in "Resolving Disputes", followed by a ruling of the Arbitration committee and/or an Administrator review. Also, just a word to wise, using phrases like "I demand" won't win people over to your cause; normally I delete such e-mails immediately but I happen to be in a good mood this morning. Good luck. 23skidoo 14:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]