User talk:Jokkemans91

Copyright problems with File:Just some random shit.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Just some random shit.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Getty Images. As a copyright violation, File:Just some random shit.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Just some random shit.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Just some random shit.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Just some random shit.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Just some random shit.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hacon of Norway and Sweden[edit]

Thank you for the good work you are doing on that king's article. You'll find that general consensus on WP is that titles of royalty should not be repeated unnecessarily several or many times within the same short text or paragraph. The same goes for roman numerals. That tends to hamper the flow of a text considerably. Use he or she as often as possible, as long as it's clear before that who is intended. Use last names (Smith, Jones...) otherwise for non-royals, and royal first names (Magnus, Christian, Ingrid...) for royalty. (Never use first names only for others though, as that's against WP policy.) Happy editing! Cordially, SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Sorry, I wrote most of this to the wrong person. SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haakon VI of Norway[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Haakon VI of Norway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jokkemans91 -- Jokkemans91 (talk) 13:31, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't review your own nomination, well some people do try and we get away with it for a short time, but once found out it gets overturned. Pyrotec (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've assumed this was inadvertent given this editor's inexperience and dropped a note at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Good King Haakon in the hope that someone more familiar with the syntax than I can fix the relevant templates. Ben Mac Dui 16:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haakon VI of Norway[edit]

The article Haakon VI of Norway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Haakon VI of Norway for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Haakon VI of Norway[edit]

The article Haakon VI of Norway you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Haakon VI of Norway for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 17:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]