User talk:John L. Booth

Welcome![edit]

Hi John L. Booth! I noticed your contributions to Garamond and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the orientation, i am reading these start articles now. John L. Booth (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help[edit]

Greetings,

Please do have a look at Talk:Black Sea#Coastal cities, requesting help; and help expand Black Sea#Coastal and port cities on Black Sea coast and trade.

Also requesting to visit Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları, an article is about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times; and help expand the same if you find yourself interested in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 12:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku: Hi, do you agreed with this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Sea&diff=1010182326&oldid=1010177656 ?John L. Booth (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:John L. Booth Thanks for your constructively contributing edit [1]; still I do strongly recommend to avoid edit war with User:Pipsally; since many times people with Phds in Wikipedia rules put well meaning users like you in edit war trap of 3 revert rule and get even a well meaning user blocked so pl. do save yourself from the same. I will discuss the issue with User:Pipsally to find a way out on article talk page and keep you informed. Thanks Bookku (talk) 07:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku:, Could you at least revert that edition? He is visibly a vandalJohn L. Booth (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku:, Thank you very much, i am waiting. Could you see about the user Pipsally and what to do? he is visible another sockpuppet account that is abusing the wiki John L. Booth (talk) 08:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ @John L. Booth: I am not much aware of whether that is a sock account and I do not know how to deal with socks. His edit's and talk page participation @ Battle of Alcácer Quibir indicates he is likely specially interested in white washing uncomfortable parts of Ottoman history. At black sea related edits too he is aware that may bring out facts which may be uncomfortable so it is an attempt of censoring content which he would not like.

Still rather than spending time on personalizing I prefer to wait for talk page resolution which we know is near facts with refs then today or tomorrow we will win, meanwhile we can spend our time more constructively some other topics. Besides we can create a table of old Black sea cities names on talk page too. We need to search old city name wise refs to detail female slave trade in Black sea in detail. The fellow is trying to stop us means more facts do exists which he does not want us and others to know. We can continue our search work meanwhile on talk pages too.

There are many topics which need to be written on Ottoman/ Turkish issues like Draft:Turkish textbook controversies too.

So let us spend out time and energy smartly. Thanks for your enthusiastic and proactive support.

Bookku (talk) 08:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku: He replied, and the answer is typical of a disgusting sock vandal abuser of the wiki's policies, he will curl up and spend my time. If you want to block it or try to do something (which will be difficult) you can do it, for now I feel coerced to contribute to wikipedia. John L. Booth (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Medieval_Monuments_in_Kosovo[edit]

@Sadko:,I tried to act like an "beta wikipedian"(as wikipedia suggests) which let vandals, nazi-fascists holocaust deniers, sockpuppets, people of bad faith(like the revisionist Mikola22), ustashas(who came out of their disgusting Croatian Nazi wikipedia to vandalize and putrify articles related "with their enemies" like serbs and jewish, anyway), assholes, edit-warriors and disgusting people do what they want (as the ~~shitty untrustful~~ english Wikipedia loves). And I saw that that user in the talk page doesn't want to do anything, just hinder and lie. Could you remove the both foreigners names, or at least make the discussion useful? And you can would also have to revert the Serb modification by shameless expert sockpuppet Pipsally (one day it will fall, and I will see pleasantly that moment), because it shouldn't be there. I will be very grateful. Anyway, every day I agree with PANONIAN, English wikipedia its disappointing with his prudish admins. Thanks John L. Booth (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my guy went ultra based. rip friend SerVasi (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miroslav Milovic for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miroslav Milovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Milovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hitro talk 06:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]