User talk:Joeletaylor

Hey, in the final paragraph of the first section says that Scientology is not an exclusive religion, or at least doesn't bill itself as one -- though this is the official position of the church, as mentioned earlier in the paragraph, Scientology is not combatible with other religions, at least not Western religions. Anyway, the statement regarding Scientology's non-exclusivity may be misleading -- in practice, you cannot be a Christian and Scientologist at once -- Scientology holds Jesus is merely a "R6 implant," not the son of God. Further, the belief in the Christian or Islamic afterlife is supplanted by the afterlife story supplied by Scientology; namely, the thetan attaches itself to a new host after the body dies -- it does not ascend to heaven or descend to hell. Perhaps the paragraph should be amended? Or change the language to emphasize that it is merely a "claim" of CoS that Scientology is compatible with other religions?

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Joeletaylor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chauvinism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chauvinism[edit]

Greetings - got your message on the talk page OK. This is the main form of communication among Wikipedia editors. Generally it may be better to have other reliable sources to support any changes to article statements. Dictionary definitions aren't bad, but it's probably good to look at definitions from more than Oxford. Also, it is a good idea to enter an explanation in the edit summary, especially when making significant changes to facts or wording. Also, you might wish to take some time to review the items in the welcome message above. Hope this explains things a bit better. Dl2000 (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Joeletaylor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Joeletaylor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]