User talk:Jjhcap99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Passport ukr.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Passport ukr.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:

Edit summary usage for Jjhcap99: 12% for major edits and 8% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 60 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. This is not optional, it is a basic requirement of editing. Grant | Talk 18:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

China[edit]

Also, please stop changing links to China to Republic of China. RoC is a name which is now only associated with Taiwan, whereas "China" covers all periods and regimes. This is misleading and against WP:POV, just as it would be to change all references to China to "Peoples' Republic of China". Grant | Talk 18:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China[edit]

A possible vandal reverted your addition of ROC to List of sovereign states in 2007. I did not revert it because it is not obviously vandalism. But I thought I'd let you know so that you can put it back.

As to whether ROC is a sovereign state, you have offered supporting evidence - that other states have recognized it - but what does ROC itself say about itself? Does it declare itself a sovereign state? I think not, I think that they still claim that they are part of China; they just don't want to be governed by the Communists. Just something to think about. Sbowers3 01:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...[edit]

Remembrance Day


--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 04:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 March 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Republic of China. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ROCVisafree.png[edit]

Hello Jjhcap99: as a Taiwanese I do appreciate your work on ROCVisafree.png. Anyway, I would like to bother you to modify it: Cuba gives ROC passport holders 30-day visa on arrival. Further, Macao gives ROC passport holders 30-day visa-free access and do not need extra travel documents. Please update the ROCVisafree.png as appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.223.42.135 (talk) 04:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:ROCVisafree.png[edit]

Hello Jjhcap99: Thanks for your quick modification. Anyway, after checking the link:http://www.boca.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1335&ctNode=39&mp=1, I still found the following countries' visa policies differ from the ROCVisafree.png and this may need your modification. Visa free or visa on arrival: Bahrain, Jamaica(do not need other travel document). Besides, many African countries ceased to give ROC passport holders visa-free or visa-on-arrival since November 2003 when "Taiwan" was added on the passport cover. They include: Benin, Cape Verde, Djibouti, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo and Zambia. I have updated the article as appropriate. Thank you for your effort and please update the ROCVisafree.png as appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.223.49.24 (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Passport ukr.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Passport ukr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +Hexagon1 (t) 04:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missions in Taipei[edit]

A contributor has suggested that diplomatic missions in Taipei belonging to sending states that do not recognise the Republic of China should not be listed with a flag of the Republic of China, should be referred to as "Taiwan" and should contain a caveat specifying sending state does not recognise the Republic of China. While he has made this change to Diplomatic missions of Ireland, it would be appropriate that whatever decision to made to this article also is made in all the other DMBC articles (both the receiving and sending articles).

  • I am against removing Taiwan's flag to the exclusion of others.
  • I am against including caveats about the status of diplomatic relations, as this is not central to articles about diplomatic missions
  • I am against a change to the self-identification principle, in which receiving states are listed according to their own name. I however acknowledge there is inconsistency in the application of this rule and would reconsider my position if there is strong support to apply the logical alternative (receiving states are named according to how sending states know them). This decision however is fiddlier and would put us in direct conflict with Taiwanese (and Macedonians) who would have other agendas.

In short it is not worth the extra work, and I am not certain that this new contributor is prepared for all the extra work (and edit wars) his change entails. Please provide your views in Talk:Diplomatic missions of Ireland.

Proposed deletion of Taipei-Tokyo air route[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Taipei-Tokyo air route, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable airline route. I can see nothing to distinguish this route from the thousands of others that exist. WP:IINFO

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Transit in India[edit]

Hi, thanks a lot, for creating the template. It really wouldn't have struck me to create one if you hadn't. Also, how do you like the new style I've given to it?

[P.S: Please reply on MY talk page]

--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smile[edit]

Template:Major cities of Greater China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Major cities of Greater China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Major cities of Greater China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dave 1185 01:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of East Asian and Southeast Asian countries by population, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of East Asian and Southeast Asian countries by population. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Visa policy of the Republic of China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an encyclopedic topic, factually inaccurate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basket of Puppies 01:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Visa policy of the Republic of China, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of the Republic of China. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Basket of Puppies 13:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait[edit]

with the addn of visa free flags in the visa policy lists until 15 December... In the text just below the mid-december-->15 december chagne can be incorporated... Rgds L.tak (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

new services[edit]

Eventhough you provided a source for those services, an ACTUAL date is needed per WP:AIRPORTS-CONTENT. Once a date is known and confirmed, then you can readd. Please take it to the project talk page if you disagree. Snoozlepet (talk) 07:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Countries bordering the Arabian Sea has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Shanghai Cooperation Organization map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to files in c:Category:Maps of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page (@ commons) - talk} 14:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]