User talk:JamesHT1967
Hello and a question[edit]
Hi James (and welcome to Wikipedia I suppose, sorry I'm not great at greetings!)... Anyway, it's great to see another editor with an interest in early motor racing. I do have a question though: can you provide a citation for your claim that the British Grand Prix Trophy was first awarded in 1950 rather than 1948? I've had a look in Doug Nye's book which doesn't say, the pdf linked to in the British Grand Prix Trophy article (which wasn't clear), and a quick Google search only gave me this ESPN article [1] which gives the 1948 date. I know you're probably new to Wikipedia (I am fairly new myself actually) so in case you didn't know information in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable in reliable sources. Just in case you haven't seen these before, maybe have a read of Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:No original research. Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello A7V2 and thank you...I am new to this so apologies in advance if anything goes awry as I get to grips with the editing process. The source for my claim is from my small collection of original programmes, which include the British GPs of 1948, 1949 and 1950. I also have photocopies of the programmes from 1926 and 1927. Each programme lists the awards and prizes on offer, and none of 1926, 1927, 1948 nor 1949 mentions any winner's trophy, while the 1950 programme specifically shows the Mervyn O'Gorman trophy. Unfortunately I am not sure whether uploading an image of the relevant page(s) is permissible. Further, the O'Gorman letter I did add as a reference shows that the trophy was not given to the RAC until April 1950, so could not have been awarded at either of the earlier GPs. --JamesHT1967 (talk) 13:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, completely my fault. Not sure how I missed that! Yes I think the letter should be sufficient. Also for future reference you can definitely use programmes or any other print sources as references (as long as they are reliable etc etc). A7V2 (talk) 01:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful - I have added source citations in what I hope is an acceptable format.--JamesHT1967 (talk) 07:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
JamesHT1967, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi JamesHT1967! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
Wikipedia and copyright[edit]
Hello JamesHT1967, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Brooklands Museum have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Sénéchal has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Eagleash (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)1921 French Grand Prix[edit]
Hi JamesHT1967. Good job digging up those old issues of L'Auto. In future though better to not put the sources in the section title. I'm aware that some older articles still have it this way but it looks terrible and can cause some weird formatting issues. I've put your sources down under the table. Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi A7V2 - Thanks, you're right, it does - did - look terrible! Frankly, I was more concerned to ensure I go the citations right than where they appeared, but will be more careful in future. JamesHT1967 (talk) 13:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
1925 Grand Prix Season: A response[edit]
Hello James, thanks for the instructive comments!
In reply to point (i), this is actually a joint idea between Philby and myself. However, I would like to say that we thought it would be a good idea to show these results tables because it can't hurt to have a visualization and more complete picture of the results that the best drivers scored at all of the top races. This visualization can enhance the viewing experience if quantified correctly. I know it's subjective, but sometimes it's easy to determine which races are important and which ones aren't, and it would be nice to see the overall performance of one driver's season in context. You can only read so much text on drivers before how each of them did clouds up in your mind.
Cheers! Johannes275 (Talk) 18:01 PM, 6 May 2021 (UTC)