User talk:Jaisingh rathore
Image description[edit]
It would help the debate about whether thise article should be kept or deleted if you can say anything about verifiable written evidence. --Mereda 15:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a well written article, and a worthy contribution to Wikipedia. It would be unbecoming to doubt the veracity of its contents. However, it would be nice if some citations are provided.Kanchanamala 07:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|
Welcome to Wikipedia Hello, Jaisingh rathore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site. If you need help see:
Here are a few more good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place Welcome, Jaisingh. I am glad you proudly say that Hindi (Marwari) is your mother tongue. Perhaps you would consider not to say that you are a native speaker of English. I am not. Welcome again [Hindi: "aapkaa swaagat hai", Marwari: "padhaaro bhai saa"].Kanchanamala 06:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply] Please cite sources[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dr. B D Kalla, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply] Hi Jai Singh[edit]I have observed that you are doing good work in Rajput articles. Keep it up. I have used some of your images to illustrate some articles. I would suggest that upload images with identifying names so that you can trace it back. I would caution not to delete entries from any article . I found in two articles Swami Gopal Das and Katni River that you deleted Jat entries without giving edit history. It is not in good taste. The author ensures while putting these entries about correctness. If you feel some entry is not convincing you, put a note on its talk page to clarify it. burdak 16:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Re: Katni/Katewa, Lord Krishna[edit]Thanks, Jai Singh for your reply. But you did note reply what I wrote you earlier. Why you deleted the entries. About Krishna it was Al-biruni who wrote it and not me. Wikipedia has to be provided with the source and Al-biruni you know who he was. It is provided. If you want to laugh, you are free. Entries you add are to be provided the source. If you delete you have to explain the edit summary. Do not take it otherwise. You are doing good work Keep it up. Do not be offended. Thanks. burdak 06:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Re:Yr message[edit]What you replied to my above not is reproduced bellow:
What history of Katewa is on Wikipedia is provided with references and page numbers. Do you know the origin of the name of Katni River ? If you have, provide with reference, so that it can be added to relevant place in Katewa or the Katni River article. It was the nagavansha that ruled at that time and Katewa were included in them. Katewa are in Jhunjhunu today does not mean they had no links with Katni or nearby areas. Today we do not have any trace of British people in India but they had ruled here. It is true that Katewa themselves may not be knowing but that does not mean that we should not write their history. We were named Hindu not by us but others. Our history's base is the records of foreign travelers who came to India. We do not know our properly recorded history. Should we not take from their records, when we do not know ourselves our history. About Al-biruni you write "if Al-biruni have mentioned anything that does not mean we cannot correct it". I am surprized at your this comment. How can we correct his records of 10th century. If you have a new theory you can provide this also saying that Al-birunu was wrong but his records can not be corrected. About the deleted entry by you in Swami Gopal Das article you wrote- "Swami Gopal das was such a personality that to confine him into a caste will not be good to him.never ask sadhu saint his caste so never mention also". The line in Wikipedia was "He was born in 1822 in village Bhainrusar situated at a distance of 22 km in north of Churu town in Rajasthan in the family of Chaudhari Binja Ram Kaswan and Smt Nauji Devi". What you deleted was Chaudhari and Kaswan. I do not undersatand what is the correlation with what you say and delete. What you deleted was his father's title and surname. His father was not a sadhu. Gopal Das was sadhu and he is not being written Gopal Das Kaswan. Your last statement seems to be out of tune of the policy of wikipedia. We alone are not judges, their is community of Wikipedia to judge and correct the things. There are administrators to correct. Don't bost over such things. Do not do any personal attack. Don't think that what we add or delete is the final wording. Please provide sources for your entries and do not delete without discussing on its talk pade. There is a policy of deletion and you have to follow that. Thanks. burdak 04:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] hi Jai[edit]I thank you for doing such a great work in wiki and informing us about our greatest Rajput forefathers.but I request you not to fall into politicial things like glorifying Arjun Singh you belong to Rajasthan and i am sure I know him far better than you ,you may not be fully aware of him , I am the same Baghel Thakur he is and belong to Churhat his own place.He is not a great person , he only knows to destroy not to construct any thing, He was just younger son of local jamindar and 90 % of his dads fortune went to his elder half brother Rao Ranbahadur Singh , and later through corrupt means he made all these properties like Kerwa palace Bhopal,Apple farm in Shimla,Tetra pack plant in Bangalore. He has brought this OBC bill only to strengthen his image to become Prime minister of India,Which I bet with you he will never ever become. we voted him for decades but he hasn't even done a single good thing for Rajputs , he gave us jobs only after taking bribes.Please check the reality then post these political things... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rahulsinghbaghel (talk • contribs) 12:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC).[reply] Banna, Some fool is reverting rajput page to his version. Please help restore it to the correct version which is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajput&oldid=102614732 Regards, Kshitij Hi, saw you editing the topics related to HP. We need people who can help Wikipedia by improving the related topics. If you think that you can help Wikipedia by contributing Himachal Pradesh topics then kindly add your name in the participant list as headlined in Wikipedia:WikiProject Himachal Pradesh. Thanks Sushant gupta 14:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Slf67) talk 05:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your images[edit]Jaisingh ji, We have used two of your images on wikitravel,for the Shimla article. They are dual-licensed under CCSA 2.5 & GDFL, so I hope that is OK with you. Please let me know. upamanyu.mallik@gmail.com or post your comments on the Shimla talk page [1]. Hello[edit]Hi! Just dropped by to say hello! How are you? Happy editing! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Balika Mahavidyalaya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template Image:Bhairu SS.jpg listed for deletion[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bhairu SS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shell babelfish 17:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply] Hi. This image seems to be a personal image of you that is orphaned (unused on any pages). If you would like it deleted from Wikipedia, please write on my talk page. --Oldak Quill 02:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Rawat Kandhal[edit] A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rawat Kandhal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B.Wind (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] Image source problem with Image:DSCF1338.jpg[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:DSCF1338.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image source problem with Image:DSC02705.jpg[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:DSC02705.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ian¹³/t 10:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply] NowCommons: Image:Picture 225.jpg[edit]Image:Picture 225.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Rajput wedding riding2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Rajput wedding riding2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion of Image:ASCUR3.JPG[edit] If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
Image source problem with Image:PHTO0021.jpg[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:PHTO0021.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply] Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] GA reassessment of P. V. Narasimha Rao[edit]I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. As it fails many aspects of the GA criteria I have de-listed it. When the issues have been fixed, it can be renominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment you may ask for a community reassessment at WP:GAR. You can see the concerns at Talk:P. V. Narasimha Rao/GA1. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] File:Picture 446.jpg listed for deletion[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 446.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File permission problem with File:Memorial at Churu.JPG[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Memorial at Churu.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:DSC00431.JPG[edit]Thank you for uploading File:DSC00431.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:PH1-36.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PH1-36.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:PHTO0030.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PHTO0030.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:PH1-3.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PH1-3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:PH1-10.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PH1-10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:PH1-8.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PH1-8.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:Picture 336.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Picture 336.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:Picture 384.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Picture 384.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:Picture 293.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Picture 293.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:Picture 196a.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Picture 196a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:KSR.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:KSR.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source problem with File:Khajiar4.jpg[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Khajiar4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Possibly unfree File:ARJUN.jpg[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ARJUN.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 10:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] File:Fresco Kuchaman.jpg listed for deletion[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fresco Kuchaman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]
Possibly unfree File:Bar60.jpg[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bar60.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notification of automated file description generation[edit]Your upload of File:Churu Desert.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Udaipur- support needed[edit]Hi Jaisingh rathore, Thanks for your efforts for improving the Udaipur article. Taking it one step further, we have initiated a dedicated Wikipedia project for this beautiful city of lakes. To get started with this, we need your support in terms of approval for this project. We are required to provide approval/support in an ongoing discussion at the below link: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Requesting_dedicated_project_for_Udaipur_.28WikiProject_Udaipur.29 Hi, Delition nomination for Amar Singh Rathore[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Amar Singh Rathore[edit]
A tag has been placed on Amar Singh Rathore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Heba Aisha (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] Speedy deletion nomination of Rajput wedding[edit]
A tag has been placed on Rajput wedding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Heba Aisha (talk) 05:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Rajput wedding for deletion[edit] The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajput wedding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heba Aisha (talk) 05:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]  The file File:Karni.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing |
