User talk:Hephzibah Yohannan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Hephzibah Yohannan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 20:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Three copies of same article?[edit]

I've noticed that you created Reflexive Self-Consciousness, Reflexive self-consiousness and Reflexive self-consciousness as three separate articles. I've added some templates and stub categories to each in order to help attract more editors that can help you with these articles. I'm not sure exactly what you are doing, but you may want to look at Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages and Wikipedia:Redirect to help sort things out. Thanks. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 20:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help[edit]

I knew there were two, didn't realise there were three. I was having problems because my links didn't work if some were in lower case (as name of a concept) and some were in title case (as name of a book) - so I put in one with each case. I'm also not sure if I am using the right method to reply to your messages. Hephzi 20:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can reply on my talk page or yours, but I'm more likely to notice it as soon as I log in if it's on mine. You can also seek help from many others, such as the help desk. I may not be around when you need help. Normally, Wikipedia internal links depend on case, but articles (except for special cases such as a person's name or the title of a book or movie) only have the first word capitalized. I hope that helps. Well, I'm logging off soon so don't be shy about asking other helpful people. There are a lot of us around. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reflexive self-consciousness[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reflexive self-consciousness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Käthe Schuftan.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Käthe Schuftan.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Käthe Schuftan has been accepted[edit]

Käthe Schuftan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, but note that Original Research is not allowed[edit]

Hello, overall your article on Schuftan is a great contribution, but please note that you must removed any WP:Original research from the article. Encyclopedias contain only already-documented facts. We cannot include unpublished opinions, conjecture, etc. It's fine to say "Professor so-and-so theorizes [citation to said prof's essay]" but it is not admissible to say "I conclude that..." So please weed through the article to remove any personal opinions, things you personally now, results or your personal phone calls, reading of old letters, etc.

Also, note that an article is not an advocacy page, so personal appeals like They would welcome any information about her life and work are not allowed.

I'm glad you're finding this a useful platform to share knowledge, but please do work within the boundaries of the rules so we can maintain consistent method across Wikipedia. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much, that's very encouraging Hephzi (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the original research Hephzi (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Käthe Schuftan. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. — kikichugirl speak up! 20:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1 February 2015[edit]

Question: I've tried, by looking at code, to add a Category page, "People from Manchester by Occupation: Artists" to add to my pages "Käthe Schuftan" and "Eugene Halliday" (that's Manchester UK) - but sorry, I can't figure out how to do it. If someone could help I would be most grateful. Hephzi (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Käthe Schuftan) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Käthe Schuftan, Hephzibah Yohannan!

Wikipedia editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this well thought out and researched article.

To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

19 February 2015[edit]

I left a message on WordSeventeen's page - "Many thanks for your message on Käthe Schuftan's page"

And - Thank you for adding the new Category "People from Manchester by Occupation: Artists" to add to my pages "Käthe Schuftan" and "Eugene Halliday" (that's Manchester UK)

However, it's still not how I meant it to be - I think I must not have worded my question properly - I wanted it to be part of this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People_from_Manchester_by_occupation - so it would be: "Artists from Manchester". Then other artists can be added to the category.

Please could someone help? I think WordSeventeen may be busy, which I appreciate. Many thanks Hephzi (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hephzibah Yohannan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The date of death in the lede sentence is inconsistent with the date of death in the improvised infobox. Make consistent. Suggest the use of a regular template infobox.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Hephzibah Yohannan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Margo Ingham has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Margo Ingham. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What would've established notability in this case would've been her own artworks in museum collections, or at least major art reviews somehow.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hephzibah Yohannan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reflexive self-consciousness for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reflexive self-consciousness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflexive self-consciousness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hephzibah_Yohannan&oldid=1143045877"