User talk:Hbartlett1

Crunchyroll is not a licensee[edit]

While Crunchyroll may stream anime on behalf of Japanese studios and in cooperation with Funimation and Viz Media, Cruchyroll is not the true licensee of these anime series. Please do not add them to the infoboxes of anime articles. —Farix (t | c) 00:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been informed that your edits are incorrect. Please stop continuing these edits before they are regarded as disruptive. —Farix (t | c) 00:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crunchyroll is the master licensee for the following titles:

KONOSUBA - God's blessing on this wonderful world! 2 Masamune-kun's Revenge Twin Star Exorcists NANBAKA ACCA: 13-Territory Inspection Dept. The Ancient Magus' Bride: Those Awaiting a Star Chain Chronicle – The Light of Haecceitas- Gintama. Season 4 ēlDLIVE Fuuka Interviews with Monster Girls Hand Shakers Yowamushi Pedal New Generation Descending Stories: Showa Genroku Rakugo Shinju Idol Incidents Minami Kamakura High School Girls Cycling Club Piacevole SUPER LOVERS 2 CHAOS;CHILD Shōnen Ashibe GO! GO! Goma-chan ALL OUT!! Rewrite Gabriel DropOut Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid Saga of Tanya the Evil Time Bokan 24 Nyanbo! Seiren Schoolgirl Strikers MARIGNAL #4 the Animation FOREST FAIRY FIVE ALL OUT!! Kiss Him, Not Me Miss Bernard said. Keijo!!!!!!!! Lostorage incited WIXOSS TO BE HERO Cheating Craft Yuri!!! on Ice My Wife is the Student Council President+! BUBUKI/BURANKI The Gentle Giants of the Galaxy NANBAKA Izetta: The Last Witch Brave Witches Bungo Stray Dogs 2 Magical Girl Raising Project Time Bokan 24 Bloodivores The Ancient Magus' Bride: Those Awaiting a Star DREAM FESTIVAL! Nyanbo! Shōnen Ashibe GO! GO! Goma-chan Twin Star Exorcists Magic-kyun! Renaissance HAIKYU!! 3rd Season Poco's Udon World Aooni The Blue Monster Scorching Ping Pong Girls

I'm not sure what your source is saying otherwise - Crunchyroll has been licensing all-rights for select titles for several years now. Anime fans seem to speculate wildly about the business side of the anime industry, but I'm trying to update dozens of erroneous series based on assumption. This is Wikipedia. Please refer to this document for more information. Anime News Network also has several other titles that have been reported to them as having Crunchyroll as the master licensee, I will also be updating those as well. Please do not continue to undo my edits. Thank you so much.

Your edit have now gone beyond being disruptive. Crunchyroll is only a streaming service. The series are licenses are held by other companies. Just because Crunchyroll streams an anime series does not mean that they are the primary licensee. Also, licenses are based on regional markets, such as Northern America, not to single countries. —Farix (t | c) 01:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the source I provided for you. Crunchyroll is the master licensee for dozens and dozens of series, and sublicenses to other companies in some situations. For other titles, there's a different master licensee, and Crunchyroll licenses from them. But for the series that I'm updating, Crunchyroll is the master licensee, and I've provided the source for me saying that. Licenses are based on whatever licenses are based on, there's no rules for how they all act. Please provide sources for the claims you're making.

Hbartlett1, I agree with you that Crunchyroll is licensing titles for home media release, and think Farix is mistaken. However, please join the conversation about this topic over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Ongoing edit wars over licensees on multiple articles. Calathan (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hbartlett1, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Hbartlett1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Opencooper (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Hbartlett1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Super Lovers. —Farix (t | c) 09:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hbartlett1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]