User talk:GrahameS

place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 17:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete material[edit]

Hi, just noticed you wiped a paragraph from Gmail. Not a good idea. Deleting material gets people upset, reverting a good faith contribution is even worse. As a new user, take it easy...contribute stuff, but don't delete other users' contributions. No harm done, but maybe check out Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes... Stevage 18:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not released yet[edit]

Hey GrahameS, "The Adventure" wasn't released yet. The video is on MTV and MuchMusic, but the CD single wasn't released. That is what the first paragraph is talking about. Happy editing, Zingazin 17:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keira Knightley[edit]

Well done on finding a legit photo, i've had a few goes but keep getting pulled up by "The powers that be" Basement12 22:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:KeiraKnightley PridePrejudice.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KeiraKnightley PridePrejudice.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 16:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abu, I see nothing wrong with its licensing (as far as I know there's no free alternative, so this image is fine), I have therefore removed the tag. Dionyseus 19:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the fair use rationale, GrahameS. I believe now, it's the best non-free image we can use for that article. --Abu Badali 13:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friends[edit]

I did that because it's up for deletion, and I figured it was better to have it back there than have all the information lost. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 03:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Religious opposition to witchcraft themes[edit]

You said: "The views of one person don't belong here, and the reference you cite is useless."

The "one person" you speak of was noticed on the national level. A person whose voice is noticed by the nation is significant.
This "one person"'s views are a clear example representative of the section's subject matter.
This is a recent event. ie. current.
What do you mean the reference is useless?

-- Jason Palpatine 20:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC) (speak your mind | contributions)[reply]

Hi. Sorry if my comment sounded harsh, I didn't intend it that way. By "useless" I meant the link didn't go to the story you intended, I think [1] is what you wanted.

As far as removing it from the article, I still stand by that. The opposition to Harry Potter on the basis of witchcraft etc. is already mentioned in the article, and the specific instance you cite isn't notable by itself - the article says it was only attended by 30 people, and only was covered in a local newspaper, definitely not on a "national" level. If you wanted to put it back you could use it as a footnote to support the sentence "Rowling has had to contend with considerable backlash, particularly from Fundamentalist Christian groups who believe the series’ pagan imagery is dangerous to their children." but i really don't think it's notable enough to deserve a whole paragraph.

GrahameS 00:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, [2] is what I meant.
It was on AP/RUETERS.
A footnote? Uh, how do we go about doing that. The lady was using some pretty strong words. Like the Presedent of Venezuala calling President Bush Satan himself. Sheshhhhhhhhhhh. -- Jason Palpatine 01:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friday Night In Hollywood[edit]

In the pilot, when Simon is warming up the crowd and then cues the announcer who distinctly says “Live from Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. It’s Friday night in Hollywood!” to which Simon replies "I love it when he does that!" also at the end of episode two right after the song has ended, and I have the whole song recorded to back me up on this(i'll e-mail the song to you if you want), the announcer once again says “Live from Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. It’s Friday night in Hollywood!” so I don't mean to throw it back in your face, but maybe YOU should watch the show, more closely that is. P.S. Google search for "Friday Night In Hollywood": [3].Comedywriter84 08:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A little of both[edit]

It appears that both titles are used at different times in different places, both seemed to be used in episode two, what i'm now saying is making a denotation addressing the discrepancy in the continuity of this issue.Comedywriter84 14:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, GrahameS! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Please see this for VP 1.3 Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 11:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Goes Around...[edit]

I understand you love your spaces but its not even that big of a deal. plenty of articles dont have spaces after periods.so unless you are on a neverending quest, i suggest you stop while you're ahead.-- Gregxscene 03:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm a english major so yeah I know the rule.I just didn't think we had to follow such a simple rule on here, but i get where you are coming from.thanks. -Gregxscene 03:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hotmail, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - xpclient ^Talk 06:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The Pacific (miniseries)[edit]

RE: "Why was the title sentence removed?"

It is called VANDALISM.

Why do people spray paint the side of buildings?
Why do people shot windows out of cars?
Why do people break into schools and smash everything they can?
Why do people rape people?
Why do people shoot people?

Asking "why?" is just feeding into the egos of such people.

75.132.141.159 (talk · contribs) did the vandalism here.

Try scrolling back through the "history" tab to find the vandalism and then restoring or reverting what they did. The "history" tab is your friend.

You only reverted half of what the user removed.

Why are we here?

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 23:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, GrahameS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GrahameS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GrahameS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]