User talk:Gershon1

Greetings...[edit]

Hello, Gershon1, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring and conflict of interest of Community Security Trust. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"controversial"[edit]

Just to be clear about something in regards to your recent edits to Geoffrey Alderman - a writer publishing an article that people get heated up about does not make it controversial in wikipedia terms. It becomes controversial when multiple reliable sources comment *about* that article and make the claim that it is controversial. --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I respectfully point out that Alderman's first JC article on the Community Security Trust was, the following week, condemned in a letter (available only in the JC's print edition) signed by some 27 leading British Jews?Gershon1 (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1) That was never mentioned in the article and 2) even then that's borderline - was this picked up by any other press agencies? --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education[edit]

Hi. With this edit some references were added. They now have tags around them but don't satisfy standard inline citation format. If ever you feel inclined to tidy these, it would be much appreciated. Personally, I find that ProveIt often simplifies this process for new links. Thanks for reading. -- Trevj (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson College London (December 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic" (see WP:42)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nelson College London and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nelson College London, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gershon1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nelson College London concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nelson College London, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nelson College London[edit]

Hello, Gershon1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nelson College London".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]