User talk:Fryguy64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Fryguy64, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Blooper[edit]

Are you sure those were bloopers in that Zelda game you listed and NOT Octoroks? Octoroks are the octopus enemy in the Zelda series.Giantdevilfish 22:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] - There are Octoroks in the game, but quite a few Mario enemies turned up in Link's Awakening, especially in the side-scrolling sections in some dungeons. Click that link to see a sprite of the fella. (Fryguy64 22:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ahh Interesting. Meanwhile I need to ask you a couple of things.

  • Do you have any info on Big Blooper? Apparently this is a giant variation of the blooper that appears as a boss in Super Paper Mario. When you listed the various Blooper variations on that article, you even have the Japanese names. I was wondering if you have that for Big Blooper.
I don't, as the game has not been released in the UK yet (where I am based). Although, I'd be surprised if it wasn't another appearance of one of the Bloopers already on that list, but with another US name. Big Gesso was the Japanese name of Super Blooper - it's possible they're the same. (Fryguy64 09:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  • I was thinking of adding a "cameos" section. Bloopers have appeared in that 1994 Donkey Kong gameboy game, Yoshi's Safari etc. (Most of these games were listed in that article before you re-wrote it.) What do you think?Giantdevilfish 01:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think games like Yoshi's Safari and Donkey Kong 94 count as cameos but as full appearances, as they are both Mario games and Blooper acts as an enemy character. I'd be happy to add them in. A cameo role should possibly be in a game where they play no part in the gameplay, such as DDR Mario Mix, or where they are in a non-Mario game, such as Link's Awakening. I didn't profess to have a complete list there, and will be happy to see more games added. (Fryguy64 09:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

MedCab[edit]

There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-06-26 List of Mario series enemies, and you are listed as an involved party there. Would it be okay, if you would like to be involved in the mediation there, if I mediate the case? Cool Bluetalk to me 20:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey friend![edit]

Kind of weird that I found you here. You remember StarfoxRoy from NinDB, right?

As I usually do to newcomers, I will encourage you to ask me any questions you have about Wikipedia. That is, if you go here often. Leo-Roy!review/gb 16:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NinDB[edit]

Could you not add the link to pages that have two or more links already? There's a restriction on the number of external links articles can have and forcing it in there en masse can lead to someone pushing for it to be blacklisted.

Also it seems to be down atm, at least on this end. Might be a DNS issue.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the rest are good for now, I just yoinked it from a few I saw that had links covering the article a la Alleyway and Super Mario Land. Everything else should be fine. It's good to see all you guys got situated on new domains at least.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo task force membership update[edit]

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we try to do every 3-4 months to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. After 1 month, on October 1, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, MuZemike 17:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo task force membership update[edit]

Hello,

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we try to do every 3-4 months (though it's been actually 6 months since the last one) to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. After 1 month, on 1 April 2010, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, –MuZemike 17:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo task force membership update[edit]

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we periodically do to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. On 23 December, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fryguy64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]