User talk:Faizwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Faizwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Invertzoo (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Susan Jarian Carrey, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.surfingincognito.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9TdXNhbl9KYXJpYW5fQ2FycmV5.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Susan Jarian Carrey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ironholds (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

This is your only warning. If you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Susan Jarian Carrey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Previously speedy deleted as a hoax Kudpung (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the articles Big-Heel Watha and others[edit]

Hello Faizwiki, Welcome to Wikipedia. I took a look at your new article, Big-Heel Watha, which is one of a group of articles about cartoons which you have been creating. You did good putting together the info box, and what you wrote was pretty interesting although the English was a bit wobbly, but I fixed that up. The main thing you need to put on the article is to say what reference or references you used to get that information. Can you do that? If so, then it will stand as a pretty good start on an article about a cartoon. If it has no references at all it may get deleted. The same thing is true for all of the cartoon articles you are creating. Thanks for your efforts and welcome to Wikipedia. Feel free to leave me any questions or comments on my talk page, best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hound Hunters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced stub about not-obviously notable cartoon.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Henpecked Hoboes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub about not obviously-notable cartoon.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Big-Heel Watha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub about not obviously-notable cartoon.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Happy-Go-Nutty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub about non-notable cartoon episode.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article The T.V. of Tomorrow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub about non-notable cartoon episode.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Happy-Go-Nutty for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happy-Go-Nutty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy-Go-Nutty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henpecked Hoboes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henpecked Hoboes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henpecked Hoboes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to RCTI has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: RCTI was changed by Faizwiki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864391 on 2013-11-09T05:46:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]