User talk:Dpugh500

November 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kath Soucie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fell sorry for you but her birth name is Katherine Elaine Soucie. Dpugh500 (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vernee Watson-Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 22:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kath Soucie, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23! You may remember this editor, who promised to never return, or whatever that is. Drmies (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Drmies: You think I remember editors I blocked in 2022? Ha! I barely remember editors I blocked yesterday. I am surprised that Dpugh500 hasn't been indeffed before now for disruption. Were you planning on tagging the accounts? I've became a born-again tagger since the apocalypse.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - You have the memory of an elephant, so yes. I don't know--if you want to tag them, go for it, but it's not CU confirmed and I found no others. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - Unsupported flattery will get you nowhere! Tagged as suspected (never thought it was confirmed, but I'm glad you looked for others).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dpugh, let me just add that the edits that you made are, well, how do I say this nicely--they're useless and wrong. This makes no sense, this is just plain wrong, this sounds like it's based on internet chatter, etc. Drmies (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]