User talk:DonPevsner

Welcome!

Hello, DonPevsner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I noticed your interest in aircraft-related articles. There is a group of editors here at Wikipedia who have come together to form WikiProject Aircraft in order to improve aircraft-related articles. You are invited to check us out and, if interested, join our team. Our project page has a lot of resources as well as article guidelines that you might find helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! AKRadecki^Speaketh 16:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

de Havilland Comet: How many produced?[edit]

I'm concerned about your edit to the number of Comets produced. I was led to believe that there were 113 C4s alone. Do you have cites that confirm your edit? ... richi 19:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC) CITE IS: "VISCOUNT, COMET & CONCORDE", by Stewart Wilson, Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd (Australia), 1996. -DLP 7/18/2008-[reply]

SS Norway[edit]

You appear to be attempting to add unsourced content to SS France (1961). Though YouTube certainly doesn't meet WP:RS, could you at least provide a link to the supposed photo/video your insertion speaks of? Also, please avoid POV, editorial-type descriptives like "spectacular" and "sloppily," as well as personal opinions about certain companies. Thanks. --G2bambino 20:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC) SEE www.midshipcentury.com for dramatic photos of the SS FRANCE being scrapped in Alang, India. -DLP 7/18/2008-[reply]

Norwegian Cruise Line[edit]

You added a personal opinion about NCL's CEO, Colin Veitch, and the SS Norway that don't satisfy POV. I personally don't like the way NCL handled any of the matters surrounding the Norway, but your edits detract from the integrity and impartiality of the article. If you have specific facts surrounding any of the above that you want included in the NCL page, please reference the sources. Thanks for your efforts and understanding. --OneCyclone 00:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC) OK. -DLP 7/18/08-[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Please do not add commercial material to Wikipedia, as you did to Noël Forgeard. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. richi 00:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC) NO "COMMERCIAL MATERIAL" ADDED. Mr. Forgeard has now been formally charged with insider trading, which violates the law in France as well as in the USA. -DLP 7/18/08-[reply]

John Rigas[edit]

You added a personal opinion about John Rigas in your edit to his article reporting on the auction of the former Adelphia headquarters. Your comments about his "ego" clearly violate WP:NPOV. I've noticed a trend here with you adding personal opinions to articles. Please refrain from doing so. By the way, I happen to be from Bradford, PA, and have been following the Adelphia case since it started. Local opinion goes both ways with Mr. Rigas, but one must be careful not to let personal emotions get in the way when reporting the facts. Thanks and please try to be more careful about this in the future. --Fredtorrey 00:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC) NOTED. -DLP 7/18/08-[reply]

PRR T1[edit]

Do you know which issue of the Keystone this was in, and the title & author of the article? Best to cite it as accurately as we can. Thanks, Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)ALREADY POSTED CITE. -DLP 7/21/08-[reply]

John J. McCloy[edit]

Hello - you made some additions [1] to the John J. McCloy regarding his inaction over Auschwitz. Can you post your sources please so we can add these to the article. Thanks - Crosbiesmith (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC) ALREADY POSTED. -DLP 7/21/08-[reply]

July 2008[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Steamtown National Historic Site, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Tomdobb (talk) 12:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I share your frustration at the state of much of the rolling stock at Steamtown (I started the article and took most of the pictures in it), Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources means that your web page can not be cited here (for one thing, it cites the Wikipedia article as a ref). Adding it constitutes a Conflict of Interest and is also strongly discouraged. What could be added as references would be any sort of newspaper or government publications (as these would be reliable), or items from most journals. Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have several points to make in reply to your post on my talk page and your edits to Steamtown.

I actually agree with you and think that Steamtown should do more to repair the engines and stock it has.
I have no problem with your using your personal website to write whatever you want about Steamtown or anything else, for that matter.
When you do write on Wikipedia, you need to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This is what I am trying to tell you - it appears you are an attorney so this is similar to rules in a courtroom in some ways - you have freedom of speech, but the judge and the rules say when you can speak and what evidence you can admit. Here sources used have to be reliable - please read WP:RS
It is also the case that adding links to your own website (even if it met WP:RS, which it seems not to) is a conflict of interest, see WP:COI. This is like a judge recusing himself if a relative or friend were involved in a case he was trying.
I asume that you know of sources that are reliable that can be added to the Steamtown article that back up your claims. Please add them, not your website.
I prefer to be transparent and conduct business via talk pages. If you have something you must say to me privately, my email is enabled. I do not check it often.

Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: (a)The update data I gave on operationality of the 3 steam engines at SNHS as of July, 2008 is accurate, and NOT AN "OPINION" OR "CONFLICT". PLEASE CORRECT ASAP. If you lost my correction, I will rewrite it.

(b)FYI, I happen to be a "reliable source." I wrote the hardest-hitting consumer-affairs column in the nation for Universal Press Syndicate for four years, and never got challenged. My position remains: if you can report "criticism" by other third parties of SNHS, you can report mine, which happens to be in article form.

August 2008[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Concorde. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Please review WP:ENGVAR ... richi (hello) 15:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. JGHowes ^talk 18:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poughkeepsie Bridge[edit]

Hello,

I have edited your contribs to comply with Wikipedia's policies regarding Neutral point of view, verifiability, and use of primary sources – original analysis of primary-source material and conjecture by Wikipedia editors should be avoided. Only previously published material in reliable secondary sources can be properly included in Wikipedia articles. In general, biased terms such as "scandalous" and "it should be noted" are words to be avoided.

As previously requested, please use the Edit Summary, where editors briefly comment upon and explain their edits. This is common practice and streamlines review of your edits by others in the Wikipedia community. JGHowes ^talk 23:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have read your email with interest, as I just went on the Walkway last Sunday – part of a 3-day New York stopover on a flight from Moscow to Florida. I can understand your passion for the renovation, and it indeed is a shame that the burned-out bridge languished for almost 35 years before something was done about it. All of what you have said may be 100% true, but Wikipedia is not the place to publish original thought and analysis: it is "an encyclopedia of previously published material from reliable secondary sources". That is why WP:V (verifiability) is one of Wikipedia's core principles. Unless a claim can be independently verified by checking the cited source(s), it does not belong in a Wikipedia article, even if completely accurate. Using personal correspondence and legal opinions constitutes original research using primary sources, which is contrary to Wikipedia's methodology, you see. JGHowes ^talk 13:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Show preview[edit]

Please consider using the "Show preview" button just to the right of "Save page". Your edits are preserved forever when you press "Save page" even if you immediately change them, press Save page again, change them, press Save page, etc, as you did recently on the Ulster and Delaware Railroad‎ page. I often make mistaeks which I don't notice until I see them "in print". "Show preview" lets me see my edits as they will appear once saved. I've had to force myself to always use Show preview even on the most trivial edits, and I think you can learn to do the same thing. RussNelson (talk) 02:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

US/UK spelling[edit]

Hi Don. Thanks for your work on copyediting various airline articles. Just a small comment: please make sure you stick to using UK spellings in articles pertaining to the United Kingdom and which were written in British English (e.g. British Overseas Airways Corporation), as per WP:ENGVAR. In particular, words such as "cancelled" and "levelling" have a double-L in the middle in British English, so "correcting" these spellings is unnecessary. (I've noticed you've had messages about this before!) Best, --RFBailey (talk) 03:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Rosendale testle[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I reverted some of the changes you made to Rosendale trestle, and why I did. There were a couple of instances in which you added commas after a month, and Wikipedia's policy on month-year combinations is that it's just the month name, and the year; there is no additional punctuation. Regarding the addition of dashes to "bungee jumping", the article on bungee jumping does not include hyphens, and neither do most of the sources used in the article. The changes you made to the Modern use section significantly altered the content and punctuation of a direct quote from the Shawangunk Journal, which is against Wikipedia's policy on quotation. Phrases such as "bizarre claim" appear to editorialize, which is also frowned upon. I have not been able to find John E. Rahl v. New York Telephone Company, Case No. 11-2266 online, but if you can direct me to where a copy would be located (or to a newspaper article that contains the same information), I would be happy to help incorporate this into the article in a way that conforms to policy. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erie Railroad NY Division[edit]

Ok, I appreciate the the typo corrections on my sandbox, I could always use help with my Erie work. Mitch32^{(Victim of public education, 17 years and counting)} 23:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New York Central Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Streamlined (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NYO&W / NY17[edit]

Are you sure NY17 is anywhere build exactly on the NYO&W grade? I think it is parallel and often on opposite sides of Fish Kill. In a few places (like E of Cadosia) NY17 cuts across the old grade and obliterated it, but NYO&W was not converted to NY17. Please check your sources and edit accordingly Blauwkoe (talk) 16:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rockport, Massachusetts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[William Francis Gibbs]], famed naval architect and designer of the SS UNITED STATES (second home: died 1967

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, DonPevsner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]