User talk:Dandaawi

Welcome

Hello Dandaawi and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Somaliland, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 15:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you i will read those rules as much as i can. Dandaawi (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Godsy. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Third opinion seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 16:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

What exactly do you not understand when it comes to not making personal attacks? AcidSnow (talk) 00:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC

Hi AcidSnow (talk) When two people are engaged a long debate accusations is natural thing . How ever i am really not interested to create animosities. Time is money None of us is paid to contribute here. As a regular editor you could have saved time to edit other important horn african pages. You cant imagine how much efforts i paid seeking third part oppinions, comments and mediation etc. I assume you are A somali and no body knows this issue better than you and me. I beleive we are almost there to reach complete agreement. So far we almost solved the sool sanaag dipute area although we will discuss Western Sool later. . I agree puntland constitution seems that they are claiming all sool but i dont think puntland authorities are interested beyond lasanod district. They claim only harti lands not the isaaq areas such as Ainabo district. We will discuss that later but first lets Solve the awdalland question. I am suggesting we should not put them on the map since they are not real functioning authority like [Puntland] or [Somaliland] .You know puntland have similar opposition Orgsnizations like the Ras Asayr state, West Puntland State etc. who are found all over google. We can not give space on the map to every group. We should be objective Dandaawi (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

I am asking you once again to kindly to please stop with these attacks. AcidSnow (talk) 16:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Somaliland map, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Somaliland map". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 6 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AcidSnow (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.. AcidSnow (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tubeec.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tubeec.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)