User talk:Crocsetal

Image:Laurie%26puppies.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Laurie&puppies.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. BanyanTree 23:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Image:Notail.jpg:

Your recent edit to Image:Notail.jpg (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 04:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Chewteeth.jpg

Image:Chewteeth.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Cheetah yawn.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Cheetah yawn.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Notail.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:CCF cheetah.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:PB122440.JPG is now available as Commons:Image:CCF Field and Research Centre.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Crocsetal, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Cheetah has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sainsf:

@Sainsf: Hello Sainsf:

You recently deleted content I added to the Cheetah page indicating that it "sounds promotional". I am sorry it appears that way, but my organization is the only global organization dealing with cheetah conservation, and much of the information contained in the page is from our 26 years of research. How should I word the information so that people are aware that there is an organization that deals only with cheetahs? The Rangewide Conservation Program, which is included in the page, is a sister organization we work closely with but they are not dedicated solely to cheetahs. Thus my adding information that had been on the page already for several years.

Thanks for your attention.

Crocsetal (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I would be happy to help you. The content you have added to Cheetah and Cheetah Conservation Fund could be problematic given your apparent conflict of interest that I came to know about after seeing this edit summary [1]. In plain words, being part of CCF you are strongly discouraged from contributing information on your organisation, as this content might tend to be promotional (this is not to doubt your intentions, we assume good faith, but cautiously), as it was in Cheetah. I haven't gone through the CCF article yet, but the same problems might occur there. What you can do is suggest reasonable changes on the relevant article's talk page with reliable third party sources to support the claim. To understand this better, please read WP:RS.

I deleted your content because you didn't provide a source, unsourced information can be immediately deleted. Please note that when you give details about when an organisation was established, what according to it does it aim for, then you can use the official website as that would give a proper picture of the organisation. But what you wrote seemed to give CCF undue weight; I don't know how many organisations out there are exclusively for the cheetah and how many conserve cheetah as well as other animals, but we should add only that information, only that claim which is supported by reliable third party sources. All organisations mentioned in Cheetah have only small, relevant mentions. This article is not the place to talk about CCF, it has its own article but again you cannot write all about CCF just from sources released by the organisation. Again you need third party sources to support claims and present different views on the subject.

Lastly, Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise your organisation. You may like to read WP:NOTADVERTISING. It may be working for the benefit of cheetahs, but writing for an encyclopaedia we have to stick to neutrality and notability. So the bottom line is, reveal your COI explicitly (please read the essay I linked) and discuss the changes you wish to see on the page. Don't by yourself add material on your organisation. And for general editing, remember to support your claims by reliable third party sources. I hope this helped. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Crocsetal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Cheetah Conservation Fund, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)