User talk:CoffeeJohn75

August 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wedding Singer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sorry for the vandalism and I promise not to vandalize Wikipedia, I agree to not harass this wiki anymore, Sorry for that again. --CoffeeJohn75 (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1][2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sir please I promised for Wikipedia's policies, So some admins blocked users such as HenryWalken, I'm really sorry for vandalism. --CoffeeJohn75 (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoffeeJohn75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry I did not vandalized the Christopher Lloyd article as I can, Respecting HenryWalken's sockpuppet account often HenryWalken has promised but Materialscientist did not hear his apology and please do not decline the unblock request I'm really sorry. CoffeeJohn75 (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 21:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're only sorry because you got caught. I don't see any edits that aren't vandalism from this account what-so-ever. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]