User talk:Chinakpradhan/Archive 1

Map of flights

Thank you for your effort. Please note, there is a spelling error in the picture: Airfield is correct, (not Airfeild)

--Schrauber5 (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please update your flight map image, it shows the correct locations but the brown line has not been drawn from the last helicopter location to the current one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K1401986 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Ask NASA. They have not enabled the flight path for 7th flight. if anyone can wait then ok or i can publish a image without the flight path line with only waypoints or in another case not even without that. please raise this in this pic's page so that someone can assist us in this matter. from my side, i did all that i can and all that nasa provided everyone. Chinakpradhan (talk) 10:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

I have a bad feeling that in the second phase of the project JPL decided to abandon the support of Ingenuity's waypoints and flight path at their ""Location Map for Perseverance Rover".". Anyway, if they resume, I may propose you some amelioration of your maps. Sample is here. All these labels (sol, distance) appear when you hover the cursor above the relevant waypoint or leg. You may snapshot each label separately, and paste onto the main image. Cherurbino (talk) 04:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

see what god tells jpl.maybe this spot will becone tiny as a dot over a course of time as seen in the similar curiosity map post my by me in timeline of msl page just around the time of this percy and ginny map

Curiosity Traverse Path showing its current location

Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

I made a pictures of the situation at sol 124. But I'm not allowed to update your work on wiki commons. Shall I send you the file? Schrauber5 (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan: https://file.io/zK5gy9x6jxPP

where's the fileChinakpradhan (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

It was available a the link for one download, but somebody else used it before you. Here is another link tat will last for 30days. Schrauber5 (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

It looks like I'm now able to upload a new version. Did you change somethingSchrauber5 (talk) 15:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

difinitely not.nor any edit on that article. might be a coincidence Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

---

Hi, Chinakpradhan! This is a link to to the map of the 9th flight. Recently I registered with the forum.nasaspaceflight.com to express regrets upon the map of Ingenuity's waypoints at the official nasa site. Hope it helps... Cherurbino (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Look what I found for you... Unfortunately, without labels. — Cherurbino (talk) 02:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

no problem i am going to post the crs 22 undocking on iss page i will post this image with labels

done but please send next time in jpg format i had to convert from png to jpg Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

No, it's not me who made exactly this picture. I only found it in one blog. BTW, the jpg format is worse than png due to the 'artifacts', or the 'dirty' surroundings around contrasting colors. JPG is good for paintings, and PNG for schemas. Cherurbino (talk) 05:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

what to do this page was made for jpg files see the image extension is jpg

it became by a coincidence Chinakpradhan (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

You may upload new versions with ANY extension, it must work. The only thing you must do adter that is to add at the top of the file the template for renaming request. Syntax is

{{Rename|NEW NAME + EXT|6|reason=bla bla bla}}

where "6" stands for the reason code "changing extension". Cherurbino (talk) 08:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

hi Cherurbino, have you got the Ingenuity location map after 10th flight nasa is not uploading updates Chinakpradhan (talk) 07:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:EDL Sequence of Tianwen-1 lander having Zhurong Rover upon it.gif

Thank you for uploading File:EDL Sequence of Tianwen-1 lander having Zhurong Rover upon it.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

i think the recent edits ensure the points needed to keep the file on wikipedia and not move for deletion and about criteria 10c i have kept the article names in bold that use this image. so i think i must remove the notice from the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:EDL_Sequence_of_Tianwen-1_lander_having_Zhurong_Rover_upon_it.gif&type=revision&diff=1031925232&oldid=1031922388&diffmode=source

Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Bennett.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Position of airfield G

Hi, you entered the folloing coordinates as airfield G 18.42810|N|77.44422|E If I shift the airfield F by 95m west I get 18.428083° 77.443767° which is 25 meters more to the west. What is the source of your coordinates? Schrauber5 (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Location Map for Perseverance Rover aftering matching its location with https://perseverancerover.spatialstudieslab.org/ if again problem then do yourself. the sources can be these 2 only. these days i am a bit busy with iss schedule so cant give time for choosing coordinates for ginny Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

hi Schrauber5, one thing can be done that if you compare the two sources you will see a small black crater near airfeild g in spatialstudieslab after measuring the distance between the centre of crater and airfeild g the two spots i found it 11.73m in exactly north east direction. so find the spot on the location map and put the coordinates if it is right??

please do the needful at the earliest and inform me Chinakpradhan (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

ISS Template

Forgot to add the commander and exp back, sorry. I noticed someone messed with the template, but i didnt know which revision, so tried correcting manually. Now ive checked, and @2409:4065:E92:F54D:4552:1D69:A1F:B5FE had removed that bit. Galopujacyjez (talk) 13:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Galopujacyjez should the warning must must be kept there for future Chinakpradhan (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Time on Mars

There is no fixed shift between UTC and Mars time but it changes all the time. The Mars time is extendend by 3% so the there are 24 Mars h each 60 minutes an 60 s for one sol. Flight 11 has happened at August 05, 2021 at 4:51 (UTC) Schrauber5 (talk) 08:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

You can just edit the template values here to get a conversion: August 26, 2021 at 18:41 (UTC) Schrauber5 (talk) 07:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Which template are you referring please tell again clearly Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

And where to edit the template you told. I didn't understood it Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assembly of the International Space Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nauka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Molly Brown (talk) 00:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem on OSIRIS-REx

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.space.com/osiris-rex-asteroid-probe-could-visit-apophis-2029, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

ok can i re-publish it in my own words Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

and please Diannaa, can you tell that Mars Ascent Vehicle from Northrop Grumman takes shape for Mars Sample Return mission - NASASpaceFlight.com is this one same as that of space.com Chinakpradhan (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I have compared those two web pages, and no, while they are on the same topic, the text is not the same. — Diannaa (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

i am not taking on the text i am asking about lisencing of the nasapaceflight one that is it like the space.com is it not released under a compatible lisence or is it a free lisence Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Diannaa please reply please to this question Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay; I was at work. The page is marked as "©2005-2021 - NASASpaceflight.com" so that means it is copyright and we cannot use it. Please always assume that all material you find online is copyright.— Diannaa (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inspiration4 mission crew.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inspiration4 mission crew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Soyuz MS-19 Crew Qualification Exams.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Crew Qualification Exams.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Soyuz MS-19 Official Crew Potrait.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Official Crew Potrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

Adding knowingly wrong statements to Wikipedia is vandalism. Stop this immediately please. The source says we don't know who flies, so don't pretend you would know. --mfb (talk) 08:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Oh @Mfb, I am extremely sorry if my edits became a sort of vandalism. I will not do this again Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

I understood the difference between the soyuz ones and crew dragon ones. Soyuz one have the confirmed crew that can be changed only when nasa will buy the seats but the 4th seat on dragons are open to any nation and will not be replaced by a american till final confirmation as in case of crew 3's kayla barron Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:9TeamBracket-AFC

Template:9TeamBracket-AFC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please delete Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

A friendly reminder ~

		Edit summary reminder
		Hello. I noticed that your edit to International Space Station did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, - ~mitch~ (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shenzhou 13.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Zhurong rover and Tianwen-1 lander taken from Tianwen-1 remote camera.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Zhurong rover and Tianwen-1 lander taken from Tianwen-1 remote camera.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Sound Of MarsTianwen-1 Zhurong Rover's Deployment , Captured By Mars Climatic Station (MCI).oga

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Reason given by recent edits on the page Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shenzhou 13.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

SpaceX Crew-3

No launch before NET May 2022 CRS-20 (talk) 00:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Don't disturb that's crew 4 Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

I thought you mean by crew 3 launch. Bro i say you forgot axiom 1 mission they will never dock to zenith port Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Don't insert comments with every change

Hi, I'm noticing that you seem to insert comments into every single change you make. Please don't insert comments without a good reason to do so. Put comments on your edit into the edit summary. Ergzay (talk) 08:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Don't use comments in the article for draft space

I noticed that in List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches you are using in-line comments to create drafts of upcoming completed launches. Rather than doing that, please create the pages you want in userspace drafts and then you can copy them to the article as you feel free to do so. See WP:UD for info on how to create drafts. The reason I say this is it causes needless churn in the article history and it's hard to tell what edits are happening by looking at the edit log. Ergzay (talk) 09:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan If you could, please reply to these comments. Ergzay (talk) 15:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

I understood my mistake so talked nothing more Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of human spaceflights in Tiangong Program

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of human spaceflights in Tiangong Program. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Htanaungg (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Only three lines are separate, so Htanaungg ca0n you add a merge tag so that my information will be added after that I am willing that my article is deleted Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Repeated additions of unsourced information

@Chinakpradhan Numerous edits you have made in the last several months have added information to articles without any kind of citation. When adding new information, please add a citation if there is not already a citation in the article. Ergzay (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

In important ones I apply the citations and I don't reuse much those citations that are already in the article Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Where the citation isn't nearby, I suggest re-using the ref name (don't copy paste it) apply it again. Please see: Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations Ergzay (talk) 15:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan You continue to do this. You just copy paste information from other sources or other pages without properly understanding what you are copy pasting. You cause more work for other people reverting your edits. Ergzay (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Please add a source for this change

Please add a source for this change: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches&curid=37574004&diff=1054541030&oldid=1054540570 Ergzay (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

No source but other mission tell so i added Chinakpradhan (talk) 23:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

If there is no source I will remove the information. Ergzay (talk) 00:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox space film

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox space film, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Use edit summary instead of comments in wiki text

You've continued to put unnecessary comments as in this edit. Please put them in edit summary field instead. Hemanthah (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Is the matter solved now?? Hemanthah Chinakpradhan (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, please do continue to use edit summary field. Describing what change was done to the article would be even better. Hemanthah (talk) 10:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hemanthah, I thought my work would be removed by thinking it not a reliable source so I mentioned Elon who tweeted on this Chinakpradhan (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Sure, but if the content is worthy it'll stand on its own. I understand the need for additional comments sometimes, but didn't see the need here. You could've linked directly to his tweet if you wished for stronger source. Hemanthah (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dnepr.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Apollo command and service module, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 07:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

BilCat, I was highlighting their engines in the infobox Chinakpradhan (talk) 07:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

BilCat was it wrong to add importance to the engine on that page Chinakpradhan (talk) 07:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Why? Where is the consensus to do this? And why didn't you cite your sources? BilCat (talk) 08:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I was going to cite the sources after completing the whole editing then I was to add on that page Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

And BilCat upon the question you asked about the consensus Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I want to say that for n1 rocket the breaking engine is blok d like SPS engine. This caused me to also put information about the SPS, lmae, lmde engines on the infoboxes of the spacecrafts that use them BilCat Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I can barely understand your English usage. BilCat (talk) 08:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

N1 rocket has the fifth stage as Blok D Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

It's usage is similar to the engine used on Apollo lunar service module Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Ah ok. It's best if you try to make most of your changes in one edit session, rather than spread them out over 10 or 12 separate edits. And you need to cite your sources in your first edit, not your last. BilCat (talk) 08:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I tried to create recognition of that SPS engine Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

So sir can i write that in infobox again if you agree Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, as long as you cite your sources at the same time.

Ok sir i am making a draft at a separate location outside wikipedia and paste it so that sources and edits appear at the same time Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan Use the "Show Preview" button on the edit page of the article rather than clicking "Publish Changes". You should only click "Publish Changes" when you are reasonably confident that there will be no further edits needed. Don't use additional edits instead of using a preview. Ergzay (talk) 11:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Wretchskull (alt), can you tell what do you mean by unreferenced addition in edit summary given for revert of my edits when I have provided those edits with more than 2 references Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Ah sorry I meant to ask Wretchskull not Wretchskull (alt). Regarding Ergzay, I will implement your suggestion from next edits Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

MS-20

Hi! What does this comment means? You seem to imply that File:The Soyuz MS-20 crew (cropped).jpg is non-free, while it is by a NASA astronaut - so it is okay to be in Commons and used in the Wiki. Erick Soares3 (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If you believe that the images are indeed non-free, why not more a deletion request? There's no way to pass unless you find any source that the Mark Vande Hei images don't fall under NASA/PD. As it stands now, is the same thing as File:SpaceX Crew-3 (official portrait).jpg, that you asked by help about. Erick Soares3 (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If you nominate it, use Help:VisualFileChange.js, because the official portraits from Category:NASA Astronaut Group 23 have the "same problem". But remember: photographs by NASA officials are in Template:PD-USGov-NASA, doesn't matter the Flickr status. The Soyuz MS-19 was by a ESA official, so it is under restricted copyright (as I confirmed by email recently). Erick Soares3 (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Erick Soares3, I find no problem with that Soyuz MS-20 crew portrait. I like that very much like the mission patch Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

But, please i want first that flickr tag to be removed from the main image from which it was attracted. Because some administrators will remove it if they find the tag still there.Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

As it tells This file may be deleted after the uploader is notified using {{subst:unfreeflickrnote|File:The Soyuz MS-20 and Expedition 66 crews.jpg}} Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

That patch was an old version, not what the crew is wearing in space (just zoom in Maezawa shouder patch and see the difference). I can't remove the tag: it is a work for the administrators, but see that it isn't breaking any rule, since it is from an NASA official. Yesterday I raised the question here, but no one replied to me. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

I remember the SpaceX crew-3 issue we discussed. Ya you got it. I want to discuss about the flickr tag posted on your images before posting them on wikipedia. Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

But as you told me i will keep them in their respective places as it is. But this is a problem earlier they were nominating such files for deletion nowChinakpradhan (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

They are using that bot tags Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

I think Huntster, one of the administators must help us out with this. Hope he joins this topic as I have seen some nasa imagery with flickr tags stating those images to be reviewed by him as commons compatible ones. Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

this is also a image i am in waiting for uploading till the result of your one Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Chinakpradhan: I've replaced the warning on File:The Soyuz MS-20 and Expedition 66 crews.jpg. Is there anything else you needed? Erick Soares3: I'll work on the list you made on Village Pump shortly. It's times like this that I hate bots, but they're too often a necessary evil. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Huntster, Thank you very much! If NASA acknowledged their own free copyright on Flickr, everything would be far easier... Chinakpradhan, understood what I said about the patch difference? Sadly that the earlier version still have this deletion request that may affect a couple hundred of these patchs. 10:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Ya Erick Soares3, I understood the difference Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

By the way jf you are willing can I place the new image on all pages that use the older ones so that other wikis are kept updated of this topic Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

In case the earlier one is deleted the others pages don't face problem with that changes Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Starlink

Starlink next launch: Do you have any ref for the Altitude of 540 km and the Incli­nation of 53.22°? Such an Incli­nation from Vandenberg will pass the hole North American continent. Normaly Vandenberg will be used for higth Incli­nation such as 70° or 97.6°, so the launch will go to the sea (security in case of an accident). Barny22 (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-next-starlink-launch-different-orbit/ Ah i made a digital typing error by writing 540km in place of 550km Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for this very interesting link. Barny22 (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Regarding many repeated edits

Hi, I previously wrote in a previous comment "Use the "Show Preview" button on the edit page of the article rather than clicking "Publish Changes". You should only click "Publish Changes" when you are reasonably confident that there will be no further edits needed. Don't use additional edits instead of using a preview." However you don't seem to be doing this and every one of your edits seem to consist of 5 or more edits instead of a single edit. Please try to condense your editing down a bit. It's okay to make mistakes but I question why mistakes must happen every time you edit and why it takes so many additional edits to fix your mistakes. Ergzay (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Ergzay i am extremely sorry but nowadays for most of the time i am without my pc and using my mobile phone that is indicated by advanced mobile edit and use of bare urls on wikipedia. in that device i have problems with editing so i can rarely use show preview there. but sir i am trying to follow you instructions as much as possible Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Do not use random twitter users as sources and do not add unsourced information

You have several times used random twitter posts as sources on SpaceX articles or added unsourced information. Please do not do that. If it's not someone who authoritatively can know something (for example Elon Musk or a reporter), then they are not a valid source to use. If you cannot find a source, then do not add the information.

Examples:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Falcon_9_first-stage_boosters&type=revision&diff=1059589651&oldid=1059566019
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Falcon_9_first-stage_boosters&diff=prev&oldid=1059555554

Ergzay (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Ergzay sir, this information of expendable fh core was approved by elon musk in reply to this tweet with no objection as you can see here thats why i published it otherwise why would i need to use non reliable info on wikipedia Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan That's not him "approving it". Either way, what you did would be called "original research" and is forbidden on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:OR. Also the tweet is from a non-verified account which is also forbidden. Ergzay (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@Chinakpradhan Also on the rare cases it's okay to use Twitter, please cite it properly rather than using a bare Twitter URL. Use Template:Cite tweet when citing a tweet. There's documentation on that page on how to use it. Put the text of the tweet in the title field. Ergzay (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

See WP:TWITTER more on twitter usage on wikipedia. Ergzay (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Also WP:RSPTWITTER. Ergzay (talk) 18:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Your edit to Timeline of Mars 2020 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. nasaspaceflight.com is a copyright website! — Diannaa (talk) 19:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

MS-19

Happy 2022! I build this crew portrait from the Soyuz MS-19 with the images that were already available with free access on Wikimedia Commons. Shipenko's upscaling and correcting is far from the ideal, but it is something (the original crop was just an icon). What do you think? If you have any idea on how to improve it, go for it! Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Oh wow🥳 Erick Soares3 great eyes you have how you got klim shipenko from salyut 7 imagery I spent a week on Wikimedia but can't find it I give a salyut to you. Chinakpradhan (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

You gave a real new year gift for me Chinakpradhan (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The image is nice but can you lessen the contrast of this image Erick Soares3 there is too much glow on his face can it be lessenedChinakpradhan (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Anna Menon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anna Menon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 03:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

ok The Aafī Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

The Aafī Anna Menon page is ready for revival after mass editing can this be done now the page says will take 3 months time Chinakpradhan (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

You haven't properly attributed where you got your text from. From the start, it appears copied, but you don't mention the source of the material either in your edit comments or the talk page. WP:CWW shows why this is problematic. Please described what you copied from where on the article's talk page. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Please check and review your article's meta data before submitting it to AfC processing. I found that you sorted this as "Gillis, Sarah", whereas this person is named "Anne Menon". I don't see how this problem occurred, since I previously already corrected that issue when your draft was in mainspace. Why would you add the wrong sortkey to the article? Blind copypasting is not a good idea. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 14:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Anna Menon, this was my first translation and I don't know how to "properly attributed where you got your text from."65.92.246.142 please help out Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@65.92.246.142: this Gillis, Sarah problem developed later while making another page Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your lack of care with the sortkey metadata is very problematic. You did the same thing to Scott Poteet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Please do not copy sort keys. Please review every article you fiddled with categories on, to check if the sort key is correct or not. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

And to say, WP:CWW tells "At minimum, this means providing an edit summary at the destination page – that is, the page into which the material is copied – stating that content was copied, together with a link to the source (copied-from) page, e.g. Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution."I didn't a cut actually said that correctly but see I told "Making a page no for him from French wikipedia resources" (And to say I I missed w in now). On French wiki only anna menon oage is there where you see the info so I said that. That much was also an attribution. Actually I didn't knew attribution is needed then also I did part attribution. But my page was moved to draftspace 65.92.246.142 Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, please indicate on the article's talk page the source articles you translated from. Translation is a form of copying, which is why a translator is not the author of a book, but the translator. So, add the source page information in a new section to draft talk:Anna Menon. There's also a talk page template for that. {{translated from}}, but you could just ask for help from WP:INTERTRANSWIKI on how to use that template. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Soyuz MS-23 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Soyuz MS-23, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

And 65.92.246.142 this page utilizes the source code framework of Soyuz MS-20 within this wikipedia but what extra attribution does it need it was a well established page and do know why this page was moved to draftspsce. Any reason?? Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Please create a new talk page section describing that you copied MS-20 (as a wikilink) as framework to build MS-23; so at Draft talk:Soyuz MS-23 you should leave that message. From WP:CWW it describes how to write an edit comment with that information. You should also use {{copied}} on Talk:Soyuz MS-20 and draft talk:Soyuz MS-23 so that editors can follow both ways. Though if you cannot figure out how to use the template {{copied}}, just leave another new talk page section at Talk:Soyuz MS-20 describing that you copied it to create a new article at Draft:Soyuz MS-23 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Menon (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Anna Menon may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Artem.G (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Chinakpradhan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Artem.G (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Replying on talk pages

FYI, Wikipedia uses the convention of indenting a reply to a message. It is detailed in WP:TALKREPLY. You may wish to use that as it keeps comments in order, so that a discussion thread can be followed more easily -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

So a reply to a message would be thusly indented -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

And a reply to that would add another colon (:) at the start of the line to indent further -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

And so on -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Merger of Sarah Gillis

Hi... It looks like you might have "merged" Sarah Gilis with Sarah Gillis by copypasting rather than by moving things around and merging histories. Is that correct? If so I think you've run afoul of WP:CWW again. This can be fixed but it will take a bit of work. All the edit history at Sarah Gilis has been lost. The better way to do this would have been with a series of moves and merges. I think you might want to slow down just a bit, ask for help instead of moving things around by copy paste. I hadn't really intended to get involved in fixing this but I do have admin, however rusty. I hope another admin with more current skills might be able to do it.

Also, looking over the content in the article now, it's pretty close to the Polaris Dawn crew member synopsis. ( https://polarisprogram.com/team/ ) A light rewording that doesn't change the sentence structure much is still plagiarism. That's another thing that suggests slowing down is better. I hope these suggestions are helpful. ++Lar: t/c 02:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok and please move on Lar to fix my mistakes. Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Don't forget to indent... as you were reminded just above, the ":" is how you indent. I fixed this for you but do try to remember. ++Lar: t/c 15:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do Lar if anything is left in this article marger as I am a little bit busy on my ddraftspace of anna menon. I am editing there so not getting time to think of merger. So if I increased your workloads by any meansChinakpradhan (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Draft:Anna Menon, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Toast (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm self reverting, didn't read that it was a draft, sorry for the mishap — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToastGuard (talk • contribs) 17:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soyuz MS-23 (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Soyuz MS-23 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Soyuz MS-23, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

@Slywriter: before 7-8 months there's no chance in getting more citations than the only source. you or any one please tell me if i am allowed to store my draft for more than 6 months on wikipedia. till now only this is the only source and some indications from twitter by russian people. Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

another ref but highly unreliable Chinakpradhan (talk) 07:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Drafts are only deleted (due to time) after six months of inactivity/no edits. If you edit the draft even just once in six months, that will keep it active. However, it should not be simply stored indefinitely. If you don't have a time frame for which you expect to have enough sources, you might want to store the text off Wikipedia(like on your computer/device). 331dot (talk) 08:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Ya but the mission is in 2023 confirmation will come in about September or October so i think my page needs time for that. Thanks for your help @331dot: Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Nauka (ISS module)

At end of January you added in the section Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipment: " Another MLM outfitting called means of attachment of large payloads is scheduled to be delivered to Nauka by a Progress MS spacecraft." (You also added it as Future Components in Template:ISS modules)

Do you have a ref therefore? If yes, can you add the ref please.

Barny22 (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Barny22: it is on Anatoly's page as Insider content Chinakpradhan (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Barny22 that is unreadable without subscription the only other citations are this unreadable image with russian labelling and a discussion on NSF. should these be good citations. no other citation is there on web. please tell your opinion. Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

There is a subscription tag in refs ( <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.Anatoly's page .com |title=Anatoly's page |url-access=subscription}}</ref> )

I would add these ref and forum.nasaspaceflight.com ref to the Nauka (ISS module) text.

Before I wrote to you I als was thinking about if I schoult erase it, because I don't found such information by internet reseach. Such refs are also helpful for me and other persons, because than we now, such informations exists.

Sorry for my bad english. Barny22 (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

please never aim to remove this statement the most you will get of this equipment is name mention in web.@Barny22:, and for that insider's content here's the ref http://www.russianspaceweb.com/iss-fgb2-mlm-integration.html this one is free It's probably in the insider's content of spacewalks 57 and 58. And so see so later spacewalks!! That's why limited refs Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Don´t tell me the refs. You shoult add refs to your edits! Barny22 (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

OK I will do quickly Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Barny22: last time pinging you just to tell I have added the refs on Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipmentI don't think I need to add these anywhere else. Please tell if needed. Thank you. Chinakpradhan (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, it don´t shoult sounds angry. For me new informations in wiki always shoult have sources, from where this informations came from. Thanks for adding the refs. And also thanks for your big engagement in Wikipedia for the Spaceflight. I like "most" of your new informations for me you add to Wikipedia. Barny22 (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you sir for the praise. will try to add more as I found on web.Have a nice day.Chinakpradhan (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Barny22 and @Jrcraft Yt: just a simple doubt.

http://www.russianspaceweb.com/protected/iss-vkd59.html , the main subsription article on "Means of Attachment of Large Payloads, SKKO" has arrived yesterday, the VKD-59 spacewalk. But, in huge despair, the only info available to us are

"The integration of the newly arrived Nauka module with the rest of the Russian ISS Segment will be completed with the VKD-59 spacewalk aimed to install a special pallet for scientific instruments on the module's exterior. It will be the 11th spacewalk to fully configure Nauka for operations in orbit." and this image.

can you help out or through someone who has anatoly's subscription to confirm which of the three is a right option. i dont need anything more from that article but a ans to this small question

The Means of Attachment of Large Payloads, SKKO is:

1)still on ground and will be transported to ISS by a spacewalk

2) it is already on ISS, transported by a earlier progress spacecraft (in this case please mention that progress to me)

3)it was transported to ISS with Nauka, itself only

please help me out in this anyone Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

I don´t have Insider content access, so I think I cannot answer your Question. I searched throu the earlier progress launches, but i don´t found some hint, that the SKKO is launched till now. On older designes (see http://www.russianspaceweb.com/iss-fgb2-mlm-2017.html) it was called "Payload interface". On the other hand it also was called SKKO in 2016 (see http://www.russianspaceweb.com/iss-fgb2-mlm-2016.html). Barny22 (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Matter is resolved @Barny22: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=23444.msg2356412#msg2356412 but please help me out once as to what color scheme should I use for non installed modules. I use black colour for the former modules but I dont see a distinguishable color scheme for non installed modules. Please suggest a colour scheme. Chinakpradhan (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

@Scottd521 can you please suggest a suitable colour for this please?? Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for Starliner OFT date edit

Thanks for the ref. I edited your cite to add the access date, because that web page gets updated a lot. An interested reader can use the access date to retrieve an archived copy of the web page as of the access date. -Arch dude (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft talk:SpaceX Starship

Hey, so I am going to rewrite the whole article with good sources, and I think that you maybe are interested about the topic as well. This is a part of the Wikipedia:Constellation program where we will do and get actual, concrete progress on spaceflight articles. Thoughts? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't have time for starship already ginny and falcon 9 eats my head with ton of updates each time. However if I get time I will try my best but seriously I do almost negligible contribution to starship. @CactiStaccingCrane Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Ask zimzalabim @CactiStaccingCraneChinakpradhan (talk) 16:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@zimzalabim Are you here? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh sorry, it should be ZimZalaBim. My bad :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I will try to add one more article to the editor manifest. As the program now is running the "Ares" theme, Ingenuity would be the perfect next page to the list. We can do both of these at once if you join the project :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand why I'm being pinged, but isn't there already SpaceX Starship? --ZimZalaBim ^talk 00:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but I am rewriting it because I have tried to improve the existing version for many months now, to no avail. I won't just try and try the same thing and expecting a different result. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Ingenuity is way too perfect bro for any changes @CactiStaccingCrane regarding any thing to be corrected is the problem with that bulky table for it the table is already in discussion to moved to a separate page on Ingenuity's talk page see there once. Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I think it must be removed till a page List of Ingenuity flights is made you can do creativity there ( I mean improvement) BTW instead of thinking of adding Ingenuity to that constellation program first think of changing the timeline of Mars 2020 page it had already got a unencyclopediac notice in a section due to more images and nobody tells what happened to Mars 2020 mission after one year on that page Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I tried but I got this notice Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I can assure you that it is not even near good article. There are rooms for improvement, and I can help you with that. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

OK please then help out CactiStaccingCrane maybe it's has become bad article due to regular updates but I have tried my best. update for constructive works if you get time in future after starship and timeline of Mars 2020Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hines.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX Crew-4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of flights undertaken by the Ingenuity Helicopter on Mars (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of flights undertaken by the Ingenuity Helicopter on Mars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of flights undertaken by the Ingenuity Helicopter on Mars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Gusfriend it wasnt the twitter refs i was using added while making the draft at that time thats portion copied here is a table already on the web at Ingenuity (helicopter)#List of flights. this was a table that was expanding so it was decided to move it to a new page. then also i will try to remove the twitter refs. thank you. Chinakpradhan (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

In retrospect I may have stated that slightly stronger than I should have. As a general rule using Twitter and primary sources is discouraged except where it is something like "fred announced on Twitter that they..." but an official Twitter reference can be viewed as the same as a press release in some cases, such as this one, but there will be a number of editors who see it and feel uncomfortable (or more). By referencing CNN, SpaceNews, etc. you are you are using sources that have taken what NASA posted and then mixed it in with their own research to present a contextualised view of what is going on. For example an article might compare the flights to the first generation of rovers. Anyway good luck with the article. Gusfriend (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chinakpradhan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, need a bracket template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Jeremy Hansen on Crew 7

Could you provide references if you're going to repeatedly share this information? Have not found anything apart from a Twitter thread claiming it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.97.232.200 (talk) 00:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

i think now its must be removed removing Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

oh its removed already Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shenzhou 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Dong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

SpaceX Crew-7 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SpaceX Crew-7, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 13:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceX Crew-7 has been accepted

SpaceX Crew-7, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Artem.G Chinakpradhan (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)