User talk:Ceres987

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mile-High Tower. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dyl@n620 21:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John's Incredible Pizza Co.[edit]

A tag has been placed on John's Incredible Pizza Co., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marek.69 talk 00:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Middle East article[edit]

What do you think you are doing there? Do you think it's funny? -- Mttll (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dubai Grand Pyramid[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai Grand Pyramid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality over quantity[edit]

Hello! Instead of creating such short articles, why not consider concentrating on making one or two of them more useful? Very short articles actually do a bit more harm than good; keep the end user in mind. He/she is going to want a lot more info than you're providing. Just trying to help.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Atrium City Towers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Atrium City Towers and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Please slow down a bit with the new articles on all of these future proposed projects; they're simply not notable at this point and they lack content/context. Instead, please consider my suggestion to improve existing articles. Thanks. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eta Hotel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Eta Hotel and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 0-14 Tower, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of 0-14 Tower and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Cloud (Dubai), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of The Cloud (Dubai) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Please stop posting so many inappropriate articles on Wikipedia. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing. --Mhking (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dubai Promenade, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Dubai Promenade and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary block[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The block lifts in three hours. During that time, I urge you to read WP:YFA, WP:STUB and WP:NOTABILITY. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Have Been Unfarily Blocked[edit]

Hello, I have been unfairly blocked for over a week. My Block says Indefinite, so I don’t know how long it is. I have been unfairly accused of being a sock puppet for someone named Shupiliumia. This is my only account and I do not have another account. I am not a sock puppet for anyone. Can somebody please verify that this is my only account and lift the block on my account. Thank You.Ceres987 (talk) 04:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]