User talk:Catherine Curran
Welcome![edit]
Hello Catherine Curran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SolarImage was provided by Robert Bruce and is a photo of the author used with his permission.
Image copyright problem with Image:RobertBruceOutsideSmallFramed.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:RobertBruceOutsideSmallFramed.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC) THIS PHOTO WAS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ROBERT BRUCE AND IS AN IMAGE OF HIMSELF THAT IS POSTED WITH HIS PERMISSION AS HAS BEEN STATED PREVIOUSLY BUT BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS TALK PAGE/DISCUSSION BY DETRACTOR/WIKI USER/EDITOR -CATHERINE CURRAN
February 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Hillary Rodham Clinton are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Loonymonkey (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
WIKI USER/EDITED MY CONTRIBUTION WHICH WAS NOT A DISCUSSION BUT WAS FACTUAL CONTENT CONCERNING THE IMPROPRIETY AND IMMORAL AND ILLEGAL DEALINGS OF HILARY CLINTON WHICH WERE THEN CENSORED BY A SUPPORTER. MY CONTRIBUTIONS WOULD HAVE RELATED TO THE ROSE GARDEN SCANDAL OF MISUSE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS TO PROVIDE A SUNGARDEN AT THE GOVERNOR MANSION FOR HER LESBIAN LOVERS WHILE BILL CLINTON WAS GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS AND THE SOAPBOX LIES THAT SHE AND BILL STOPPED THE GENOCIDE BOSNIA SERBIA AND THAT SHE "BRAVED SNIPER FIRE" JOURNALIST PROVED SHE LIED AND ATTENDED AFTER PREVIOUS PRESIDENT HAD FORCED A PEACE AND WAS GIVEN FLOWERS ON THE TARMACK BUT NO SNIPER FIRE AS IT WAS ALL OVER.
Fictional portrayals[edit]
Thank you for your additions on the fictional portayals of Stephen. This section could use further improving. Could you take a look at template:Cultural_depictions_of_English_and_British_monarchs and see if you can to find underdeveloped sections? Sorry if I am bothering you. Dimadick (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
July 2012[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Female disciples of Jesus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Orthoepy (talk) 03:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Female disciples of Jesus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 04:16, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I HAVE RESEARCHED THIS AND PLACED SOURCES FROM THE HOLY BIBLE AND GNOSTIC APOCRYPHA FOR THE OMISSION OF THE FEMALE APOSTLES WHO ARE 7 , SIX OF WHOM ARE NAMED IN ANCIENT TEXTS
THIS ARTICLE WAS EDITED BY A DETRACTOR WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE CHRIST HAD FEMALE APOSTLES A MYSOGYNIST MYTH PERPETUATED BY PETER AND BISHOP IRENEAUS OF LYONS FRANCE.
Dispute resolution noticeboard[edit]
Hi there - I see you made a request on the dispute resolution noticeboard, but it looks like you used the old form. What do you see when you go to this page? Steven Zhang Get involved in DR! 07:15, 28 July 2012 (UTC) I hit the link given. Update the link or put in a complaint so someone else will.
THERE IS NO LINK TO REPLY TO YOU STEVEN AND NOTHING ON YOUR TALK PAGE TO REPLY TO EITHER.
Slavery[edit]
Hi! Interesting additions to Slavery; what's your source for all of this? --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC) I CONTRIBUTED TO THIS PAGE AFTER RESEARCHING SLAVERY WITH MY SON FOR A SCHOOL PROJECT AND GATHERED MATERIAL FROM OTHER BOOKS AND SITES ONLINE INCLUDING OTHER WIKIPEDIA PAGES, I GENERALLY LEAVE CITATIONS AND EXPECT I DID IN THIS CASE, ALSO.
December 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Mattis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{cite web[[url=http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/James_Mattis}}</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional characters on the autism spectrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
List of fictional characters on the autism spectrum[edit]
This article is only for characters that have been confirmed by their creators to be autistic. Otherwise, it's just speculation. JDDJS (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014[edit]
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robert Bruce (author)[edit]
The article Robert Bruce (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article lacks reliable secondary sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 13:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Robert Bruce (author) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Bruce (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bruce (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Catherine Curran. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)