User talk:Campus27

Welcome![edit]

Hi Campus27! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Darwinek (talk) 17:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Marè moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Alex Marè, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SANTADICAE🎅 18:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Praxidicae:, specify what is wrong with the page? Campus27 (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's complete spam, for the same reason it was deleted on itwiki. SANTADICAE🎅 18:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Actually, according to some discussions in the itwiki, it would meet the requirements. There are many articles at the national level, which talk about him and his book. Campus27 (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are about 30 articles, mostly newspapers, that talk about his activities. To be called by an archbishop to exhibit an exhibition on commission, thus becoming the first person to exhibit in the Cathedral of Fermo, is a good recognition. Campus27 (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Marè (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Marè and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex Marè, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Campus27! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Marè (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alexandermcnabb were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional tone continues to be an issue, but above that hangs the spectre of notability - is the subject notable as per WP:GNG? As it stands the article would not survive AfD - the sources are in the main 'owned media' linked to the subject and there is a lack of WP:RS reliable sources. I would suggest a read of WP:CREATIVE in addition - the subject does not meet that standard.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Marè and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alex Marè[edit]

Hello, Campus27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alex Marè, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alex Marè[edit]

Hello, Campus27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Marè".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]