User talk:BrandonSkyPimenta

This is where you post me messages.
Post your question below by clicking the "New Section" button at the very top of this page.

How do I go further with Wikipedia (undeleting, creating, etc.)?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I go further with Wikipedia (undeleting, creating, etc.)? I should ask the help desk. BrandonSkyPimenta (talk) 03:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BrandonSkyPimenta. As you've been registered on Wikipedia since November and you've made 21 edits, you have the user rights to go ahead and make an article! As you're new to creating articles, I suggest you look at the Article Wizard – it's a simple step-by-step guide to writing articles. As for undeleting, that is a user privilege restricted to administrators. You can, however, request an article's undeletion through the requests for undeletion page. I hope this helps! matt (talk) 09:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, BlahBlahBia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 03:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I deleted your article was because there was nothing useful coming from that article, just random words. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 19:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't disrupt by asking repeatedly for restoration of this page. Consider doing something useful. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 17:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Screen shot 2012-02-05 at 12.08.22 AM.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Screen shot 2012-02-05 at 12.08.22 AM.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Screen shot 2012-02-05 at 12.08.22 AM.png[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Screen shot 2012-02-05 at 12.08.22 AM.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrandonSkyPimenta [edit]

Hello BrandonSkyPimenta. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrandonSkyPimenta[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrandonSkyPimenta, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xicn[edit]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xicn, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xicn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xicn during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. →Σ τ c. 02:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrandonSkyPimenta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I'm appealing this block is because I'll try not to vandalize Wikipedia again and do something useful. BrandonSkyPimenta (talk) 23:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced by language such as "try" . You will either continue to vandalize or you will not. Please describe what productive activities you will engage in if you were unblocked. Tiptoety ^talk 04:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BrandonSkyPimenta (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All your edits have been disruptive, which generally means your only goal on here is to be disruptive. I heavily doubt any admin will seriously consider this request - especially since the only thing it seems you're sorry for, reading the unblock request, is getting blocked. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Arbitration Committee declined block appeal[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the appeal by BrandonSkyPimenta and has declined to unblock at this time. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 13:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]