User talk:BosniaksLoreExpert
Welcome![edit]
Hello, BosniaksLoreExpert, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:BosniaksLoreExpert/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 19:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:BosniaksLoreExpert/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 19:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC) how is this vandalism though? it's a sandbox page.BosniaksLoreExpert (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Upsetter (song)[edit]
Hello, BosniaksLoreExpert. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Upsetter (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
The page The Sun is a deadly lazer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of "Most Racist Football Club in the World"[edit]
Most Racist Football Club in the World, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.
You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- how is that vandalism? there are so many people who know that club as that if this is vandalism then i must be bill clinton. BosniaksLoreExpert (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of I will love it if we beat them[edit]
A tag has been placed on I will love it if we beat them requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall talk 20:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
BosniaksLoreExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
what disruptive edits?BosniaksLoreExpert (talk) 16:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you see nothing wrong with your inappropriate edits (including WP:EW, among other things), we have to leave the block in place. Yamla (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
i don’t see what you mean by “disruptive edits”, all i have done so far is make redirects, some of which might’ve been wrong yes that’s an honest mistake but that’s not at all justifiable for an INDEFINITE BLOCK.
some of the redirects that were deleted were both honest mistakes. such as the kevin keegan one which i named that because the sky sports retro youtube channel lists the quote as “i will love it if we beat them” (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mk87a7r0V60) and not “i would love it if we beat them” like on the wikipedia page that mentions said quote. the new canaan one should’ve been a redirect to bill wurtz as that’s what that erroneous town name is most associated with anyway. BosniaksLoreExpert (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
BosniaksLoreExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the only edit warring i did was on bill wurtz’s page i have not done anything like that on any other page, give me another example for god’s sake. BosniaksLoreExpert (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The edit warring is sufficient to block you, and you also disruptively created pages. You offer no reason here to lift the block. 331dot (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BosniaksLoreExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
that seems very strict don’t you think? i know that competence is required but there is no other way to describe this as strict! overwhelmingly strict but as for the disruptive created pages, (at least the ones i can think of of being disruptive in some way), i wanna admit all of them were my honest mistake, and i probably should’ve learnt from it but i have nowBosniaksLoreExpert (talk)
Decline reason:
This request does not address the reasons for the block, nor does it describe how the behaviour will change to avoid another block. In future unblock requests, I suggest that both of these points be addressed instead of commenting on the supposed strictness of the block. Z1720 (talk) 02:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.