User talk:Bksatyanarayana

Welcome[edit]

Hello Bksatyanarayana, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Bksatyanarayana, good luck, and have fun. --Harkey (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for creating an account and thank you for your feedback. Don't forget you can always get help by typing {{helpme}} on this page. Is there anything more that we can help with right now?

Harkey (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that I submitted my comments on Sudarshan Chakra of Krishna under a different article -Chakra-on 3 June .Please transfer those comments under -edit- to the article on Sudarshan Chakra of Krishna ----BKsatyanarayana

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Bksatyanarayana, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Charles (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see that all your additions to articles have been promptly reverted. This is because the content seems very dubious and is not verifiably attributed to reliable sources. There may also be concerns that this is original research or fringe perspectives.

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wareh (talk) 14:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as seen in Gerrha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as seen in Asmodeus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wareh (talk) 01:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Unsourced_additions.2Ffringe_etymological_theories[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wareh (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC) P.S. Archived here. Wareh (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 06:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The block[edit]

I blocked you because of the warning above and the discussion at ANI about your edits, which you have ignored. I noticed that you usually edit several days apart and that a short block, which is standard for a first block, may not be noticed until it expires. Notwithstanding that, I expect you to read our policies above, particularly WP:RS and WP:VERIFY and follow them. I'm afraid that if you don't, longer blocks may follow and it would be good to avoid those. Dougweller (talk) 06:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Herem (war or property). This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. St Anselm (talk) 08:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Goliath, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have ignored your earlier block and haven't replied to my post. I don't want to see you blocked again but if you continue to add unsourced fringe material to articles I will block you to protect Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maha Padma Nand.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Txcrossbow (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've been warned before[edit]

on violation our original research policy and adding your personal commentary to articles. Please note that if you continue to do this, you will be blocked, as you don't seem to be addressing these problems and are editing disruptively. —SpacemanSpiff 07:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 10:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since your last warning above by another Administrator (and of course my earlier block and warning), you have twice added original research to articles. You were reverted both times by other editors. I was tempted to make this indefinite but am giving you one last chance. You can get unblocked sooner by showing that you understand why you were blocked and convincing an Administrator that you will start sourcing your edits. After the unblock repetition of original research might lead to an indefinite block.

If anyone else sees this occurring, please do let me know. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Astarte[edit]

Regarding your recent edits to Astarte, you need to be able to source your material and write in encyclopedic style. If you are having trouble with that, please add your material to the Talk page and allow otehr editors to have a look at it as well. Web Warlock (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ishtar etc.[edit]

How would Sanskrit origin explain the voiced pharyngeal consonant ʕ ע at the beginning of the name?? -- AnonMoos (talk) 20:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Denmark. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

It seems you have a history of this pattern of editing. If you can find any references to your information then it can be included, but even then it must be reduced per WP:FRINGE. -- Peter ^{Talk to me} 19:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above message was posted not by User:Peter, but by User:Hazhk

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology of the word Gautemala- it is the land of Gautama-the Great Buddha[edit]

Gautimala-etymology- The Nahuati word Cuaustema is derived from the word KUAUSTEMA which is derived from the word' GAUTAMA'. Thus the word Gautemala means Gautema-ra( -ara is the possessive case ending used in the North -Eastern languages of India, eg. Bengali) Thus the word Gautemala means the land of Gautama. Gautama is none other than Lord Buddha. Full name of the Buddha is ' Siddhartha Gautama Buddha' , the great philosopher -saint who was born around 500 B.C.' in a forest on the borders of India and Nepal. This place also happens to be the original home land of the Naga People ( the Maya people ). Buddhism was propagated world-wide by the famous emperor Ashoka of India around 250 B.C. The new religion was well-received by the people right from Afghanistan,Baluchistan Iran, Syria, Egypt,Greece and Italy in the north to Tibet, China,Cambodia,Laos,Burma,Thailand, Vietnam and Sri Lanka. Thus Buddhism spread right from the Buddhas of Bamian in Afganistan ( home-land of Nahua People) to the Wat Pho, the temple of reclining Buddha in Bangkok ( Thailand), and the temple of Buddha called Boro-Bodu ( Big Buddha)in Java. It appears that the Buddhist monks who traveled hundreds of miles in the cold Himalayan valleys and sailed hundreds of miles in the Indian Ocean might have reached central America also in those days, and were given a hearty welcome by both the Maya people and the Nahauti people. A number of great historians and archaeologists have pointed out the influence of Buddhism in Central America. Full details of their observations are available in the book " Hindu America " -Chapter-XII-"Buddhism in America", written by Shri Chamanlal,Published by the Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan,Bombay, in the year 1960. In page 244 of this book the author has quoted some observations of experts in the field. For example Mr. Squire in his book ' The Serpent Symbol' had pointed out- " The Buddhist temples of Southern India, Ceylon and the Indian Archipelago correspond with exactness with those of Central America.---Several structures at Palenque ( Central America) completely correspond with the dagobas of Ceylon." Similarly Sir Stanford Raffles in his book" The History of Java" points out -The great temple of Buddha in Java might readily be mistaken for a central American temple. Del Rio who made wide excavations in central American temples points out - " In their interior structure as well as in their exterior form and obvious purposes, the buildings correspond with greatexactness to those of Hindustan and the Indian Archipelago. [ Reference- Hindu America,by Shri Chamanlal,Published by the Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay, May 1960. Bksatyanarayana (talk) 18:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Bksatyanarayana[reply]

UTRS Account Request[edit]

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Bksatyanarayana (talk)Bksatyanarayana