User talk:Avery 917

Welcome Avery 917!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,462,750 registered editors!

Hello, Avery 917. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Hi Avery 917, you may be interested in WikiProject Highways. S0091 (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway. Thanks! Imzadi 1979 → 21:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Road Sign Showdown![edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Road Sign Showdown!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sounder Bruce 05:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:All Traffic Signs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:All Traffic Signs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-encyclopedic gallery, redundant to Commons

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sounder Bruce 05:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irɂis ilwol[edit]

Ɂirdoq’heɂr? A’oqa’oǂaf? Woel. Nha’afǀas ydb’ǂe. QUBD. {ǃirtf} {ǃu’irft} …qoɂ’eq… {ǃe’irft fʘu} Avery 917 (talk) 23:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

De dhing iz ghrinh.

/de ðiŋ is grin̥/

Waye?

/ɥai/ Avery 917 (talk) 23:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ɂaf a’iɂuf

/af aiʔuθ/ Avery 917 (talk) 23:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Domingora

/domiŋoɾa/ Avery 917 (talk) 23:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi’oqr’ef

/ʢiʔokɤːf/

Jur’ef

/ʤʊ̆əːf/

Dhe’ukifr’ef

/ðɛʔukɨθʌːf/ Avery 917 (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway[edit]

Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Carolina-Virginia Highway during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 23:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Myrgyz Language[edit]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Myrgyz Language. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Avery, please take care to only add correct and referenced information to Wikipedia. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There do exist forums for conlang enthusiasts, but Wikipedia talk pages aren't the right place for that (WP:NOTFORUM, WP:MADEUP) – Thjarkur (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 01:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblockage[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avery 917 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to get back to editing Wikipedia Avery 917 (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great. Please tell us what you did wrong, and what constructive contributions you wish to make to this project to write an encyclopedia. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you try to unblock me?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avery 917 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked please Avery 917 (talk) 18:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying you lack sufficient competence to even craft an unblock request. You'll probably get at most one more unblock request. I suggest you reread WP:GAB and answer 331dot's questions. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avery 917 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE CAN SOMEONE UNBLOCK ME SO THAT I CAN EDIT SOME MORE WIKIPEDIA Avery 917 (talk) 20:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You just used a sock account to "accept" your appeal. So no, you won't be unblocked. Talk page access revoked. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]