User talk:Aurelian Virgil Dragne

March 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sphinx, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello,

what's your real name?

This is a massage for you, it seems that what you did is not cool...

"Maybe you'd have better luck adding that to as a "see also" link? A sphinx, after all, is a mythological beast. The other editors seem to think that a rock outcropping is off-topic for the article body. It's hard to tell exactly what their objection is because they're not using edit summaries, but that'd be my guess. To be diplomatic, you could suggest it on Talk:Sphinx to see if anyone has objections to that. @Apokryltaros and HMSLavender: it would help a lot if you guys used edit summaries. Rollback is supposed to be for vandalism, and if your only objection is formatting, WP:PRESERVE is pretty clear that reverting because of poor formatting is not a good idea. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)"

P.S. Please, revert the Sphinx article back, because I researched for this, not only on Wikipedia.

Thanks,

Aurelian Virgil Dragne Aurelian Virgil Dragne (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:NinjaRobotPirate that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You attacked two editors there. You also failed to show good faith Doug Weller talk 08:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doug Waller,

I seem to have annoyed a lot of people because I've added to the already existing Wikipedia information on that Sphinx article. The attached statements were not written by me, before you accuse me, you might want to look up what happened. There is a history with ISO DATES.

I didn't offend anyone, I wrote the obvious about what happened with my post.

I'm sorry I came to the conclusion that the information is censored on Wikipedia by certain users.

A few minutes after I posted, my post was deleted.

Thank you,

Aurelian Virgil Dragne Aurelian Virgil Dragne (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is not censorship. Anything that doesn't conform to our policies and guidelines can be deleted. That's not censorship. Your user page statement is wrong. Doug Weller talk 07:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And don't ask people for their real name. Note that if you ever found it and posted it, you'd likely be blocked. Editors are entitled to their policy. Doug Weller talk 07:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aurelian Virgil Dragne! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sphinx that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lupul Dacic (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lupul Dacic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 07:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aurelian Virgil Dragne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 07:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does "This seems to be the beginning of a beutiful friendship with the forbiden truth about the history of Europe" mean?[edit]

Doug Weller talk 08:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lupul Dacic[edit]

Hello, Aurelian Virgil Dragne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lupul Dacic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Lupul Dacic[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Lupul Dacic, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]