User talk:Ashish 1816

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ashish 1816! Your additions to Virat Kohli have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

I try to improve the article by rectifying grammatical mistakes , adding missing information . I have been following the Wikipedia guidelines in attempt to edit the article but for some reason whatever part of article I edit , it gets removed as whole from the the article only (specifically : Virat Kohli) even though I give a reference. could you please explain , who and why gets it removed? Ashish #23 (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Virat Kohli

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Virat Kohli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cric Edits -- Cric Edits (talk) 15:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashish 1816. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi - look, there's no nice way to say this, but that was a really silly thing to do. The whole point of the Good Article review process is so that an uninvolved and experienced editor comes to look at the article, check that it complies with policy, suggest improvements, etc. You attempted to subvert that process by attempting to review your own work - I don't know why you did that, but it wasn't a good idea, either for the article, or for your reputation. I can understand wanting to get the article to GA status - I enjoy doing that myself, when I can find the time - but you need to do that in conjunction with an experienced editor who really knows what they're doing. This is just a temporary block; after the block expires, you are welcome to work on the article review if someone else volunteers to do the review for you. If you do something like this again however, the next one will probably be indefinite. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 17:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

@Girth Summit Apologies for my actions Ashish #23 (talk) 09:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Virat Kohli

The article Virat Kohli you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Virat Kohli for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cric Edits -- Cric Edits (talk) 13:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Your edit to Virat Kohli has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Apologies , I will keep this in mind when editing next time. ✨Ashish Legend✨ 16:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 ICC Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kohli img vs AUS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kohli img vs AUS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Virat Kohli Statistics moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Virat Kohli Statistics. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It was moved to mainspace by a user who was not competent to do so, please resubmit your draft, and hopefully, a competent reviewer will do it this time.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virat Kohli Statistics has been accepted

Virat Kohli Statistics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virat Kohli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vegetarian diet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Recommended signature update

Hi there! This is a friendly note to let you know that your current custom signature has some obsolete code in it, and it needs an update. Here is recommended wikitext to update your signature:
[[User:Ashish 1816|<i><b style="color:DarkOrange;font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">✨Ashish Legend✨</b></i>]]

Here's how to update your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Change the signature as shown above, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature. Happy editing! – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks mate! ✨Ashish Legend✨ 13:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Virat Kohli Statistics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virat Kohli Statistics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virat Kohli Statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 11:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dhruv Rathee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dhruv Rathee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I.am.a.qwerty -- I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

2023 ICC World Test Championship

Please check the previous format of 2021 ICC World Test Championship final you can clearly see summary is written first then scorecard is written. You have mixed both. Either change it yourself or I will change because it takes time. MNWiki845 (talk) 16:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

I considered mixing things up a bit because it felt like it would go well with the flow of the team's innings. However, having the summary followed by the scorecard doesn't seem like a bad idea, so I'll stick with it. I think we can agree that it's a good way to present the information. ✨Ashish Legend✨ 05:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Also, seems premature to nominate the final article for a good article one day after the event finished. I doubt it's possible to make enough updates in that time to pass a GA review. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Alright, I totally understand and appreciate your concern. It's completely valid and makes perfect sense. I initially thought that it was good enough to be nominated, but now I realize that it might not meet the required standards. My bad for not realizing it earlier. So, I'll take back my nomination until I can make the necessary improvements to make it nomination-worthy. ✨Ashish Legend✨ 08:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final

On 13 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dhruv Rathee

The article Dhruv Rathee you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dhruv Rathee for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I.am.a.qwerty -- I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Kohli Controversies

• Since you work a lot on the article, im suggesting you a few changes
• Work on controversies (aus test spat, gambhir, naveen, others)
• Prolly make a navigation box
• focus on getting article ready for ga

Pharaoh496 (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)