User talk:Aristophanes68/Archives/2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Aristophanes68/Archives/2009! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Addbot (talk) 13:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Getting Started
Useful Links
Miscellaneous
Work Groups
Projects
Similar WikiProjects


WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter (June 2009)

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - July 2009
Project news
  • The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles!
Member news
Other news
  • I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much.
Related projects news
Member contest of the month
  • The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month.
Christianity related news
From the Members

Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page.

John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 22:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Nawal Wuj

Hi Aristophanes. I'd previously come across some info on this publishing/printing outfit, when digging for sources on cholsamaj with the (as yet unrealised) intention of doing an article on the latter. I've put up what I know at talk:Maya peoples. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 00:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Contradict-inline template

Here:

{{Contradict-inline |article= |date= }}

-- Denelson83 19:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead and add the documentation. -- Denelson83 20:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Your AIV report

Thanks for your AIV report on the IP vandals from the Philippines vandalizing the Greg Plitt article. It would be better to protect the article for a while if the vandalism gets too intense, rather than blocking all the IPs. I will definitely watch the situation. Academic Challenger (talk) 00:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I am not quite sure about the simple change of paragraphs you proposed. The chapters of the definition were roughly ordered to give a chronology and an argument. I my self felt, I might get rid of the last paragraph altogether. I'll give it a thought, though. To change the sequence will require a change of the line of the argument as well (I feel) --Olaf Simons (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I have revised the passage in the sequence of chapters you proposed and hope I could give it a new coherence of the individual observations. It would be good if a native speaker checked the new chapter. Hope I was able to improve things. --Olaf Simons (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Greg Plitt

As the vandalism has continued, I have semi-protected Greg Plitt for one month. Academic Challenger (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to the page, and I am very glad to see most impressive changes so far. If you like someone else help you, I would recommend Wikipedia:Requests; subsequent pages such as Wikipedia:Requests for feedback and Wikipedia:Peer review would be better recommendation. --Gh87 (talk) 06:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Smallville edits

I appreciate your work on Smallville, but I thought you should know that your use of comma location is incorrect. Per WP:TQ, Wikipedia uses the British style of punctuation with quotation marks. Basically, unless the punctuation (e.g., commas, periods, etc.) is part of the actual quoted text then it goes on the outside. If it is part of the text, then it goes on the inside.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know--I had never heard that about WP! Aristophanes68 (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Angélico Chávez a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Angelico Chavez. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I didn't realize that I could Move it that way! Aristophanes68 (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Aristophanes68. I just wanted to let you know that the reason this article's plot section has not been updated to include a lot more, other than my not knowing their complete history (despite having watched this show for years), is WP:PLOT. The reason I had cut it off the way I did was to keep people from adding more and more plot to it. I would not want this article's plot section to be close to Luke and Laura's. 22:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)