User talk:Amymiller104

Welcome!

A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Amymiller104, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC).

"The Fat Duck" introductory sentence restored

Hi, on "The Fat Duck" page I noticed that you removed the text: "In 2009 the restaurant suffered from the largest ever recorded norovirus outbreak with over 400 diners falling unwell." on the grounds that the information is repeated in the "Food, scare and closure" sub-heading.

I wanted to let you know that I've undone that edit. Wikipedia articles cover topics at several levels of detail: the lead contains a quick summary of the topic's most important points, and each major subtopic is detailed in its own section of the article. The sentence about the norovirus in the introduction acts as a quick summary of the more detailed information further down. If you look at most Wikipedia articles you will notice the same pattern - the introduction summarizes the content. I can see how it might look like repetition, but it's actually a summary at a different level of abstraction.

Toffeepot (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Concern

The way you are editing the Heston Blumenthal related articles is often far from neutral and often in my opinion corporate promotion. All by itself, it gives me the impression that you are in some way closely to Heston Blumenthal and is business affairs. It is clear that you have a Conflict of Interest, making it difficult for you to maintain the neutral tone and style the encyclopaedia needs. Instead, you often use a marketing/promotional tone and style. Paid editing, even as part of your daily work, is frowned upon. It can be reason for blocks. The Banner talk 16:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)