User talk:Ajesg
I see that you've reverted my edits on the grounds of bad grammar. Could you please point out those instances? Well it just seems to me that you've simply reverted the edits and did not make any corrections at all concerning the grammar and construction.
And yes I am very well sure that my input is backed by sources. Actually, the current [the ones you've restored] are the ones which are not supported by correct sources. For instance, the history section cites the Ramon Magsaysay awards pages lots of times. But the page doesn't even mention anything concrete about the history of the university or at least something similar to it.
For example:
The following text is the one you've restored.
- In 1946, the American Agricultural Mission to the Philippines urged the US to support the college’s experiment station. By 1950 the US Economic Survey Mission to the Philippines reechoed that recommendation, and a program headed by [[Cornell University]] was set up. 10 to 14 professors from different American universities would come and live on campus annually, bringing with them fresh ideas and knowledge of gains made in many fields. A number of younger Filipino [[teacher|faculty]] also went to [[Cornell]] and other US universities for graduate study. The program became so successful that the college began to receive major grants from prominent international organizations such as the [[Rockefeller Foundation]], Council on Economic and Cultural Affairs, Committee for Free Asia and the [[Colombo Plan]].<ref name='Ramon magsaysay award' />
The Ramon Magsaysay page doesn't make any mention of such event. It is actually the source which I cited (Hilario's 100 Years) which makes of such claims.
You also removed the photos that I've included in the article. I do not see why they should be excluded given the fact that they do improve the reader's understanding of the article, and neither do these infringe copyright regulations. In fact most of them are in public domain.
You also removed this
- |campus = 14,665 [[hectares]] (147 km²)<ref name = 'OVCRE'>{{cite web| url = http://ovcre.uplb.edu.ph/index.php/about-uplb-rde/resources-for-research-extension/9-facilities-equipment-and-library-resources | title = Facilities, Equipment and Library Resources | publisher = Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension, University of the Philippines Los Baños|accessdate = 2011-03-20}}</ref>
in favor of this
- |campus = 14,665 [[hectares]] (147 km²) <br>[[university town]], [[land grant university]]
Again, I do not see why the citation for the campus size should be removed, given that it's the actual proof that the size is actually 14,665 ha. I am well aware that UPLB has received several land grants. However that doesn't make it a land grant university per se. Their is no such classification under Philippine law. The only reason we see them in US universities articles is because the US actually has a law which defines what are land grant universities. The contribution of UPLB to the Los Banos community is indeed significant, however again we cannot put a classification that it is a university town given that it's not actually a town (this would be better put in the Los Banos article), and no evidence/source can be put forth that can support that it's actually classified as a university town.
So to cut it short, I am reverting your edits in favour of my edits. Your reason for reverting it has no clear basis.
Also, their is no need to remove the warning you've got from ClueBot about unproductive edits. Moray An Par (talk) 06:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
UPLB graduation[edit]
Do you have any photos? It'll be much use in the article. A photo of a sea of students in toga while in their seats/procession would be preferable. Or anything that would fit the caption "UPLB graduates wear a black cap and gown[76] as opposed to the graduates of other UP constituents who wear the sablay.[77][78]". Moray An Par (talk) 09:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit]
This discussion might be of interest to you. Moray An Par (talk) 07:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
You might also be interested in copy editing Campus of University of the Philippines Los Baños. It's currently under featured article review. Moray An Par (talk) 16:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Philippine WikiCon[edit]
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Proposed blackout in protest of RA 10175[edit]
Dear Ajesg,
Greetings!
As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.
Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.
Thank you and maraming salamat po!
Kind regards,
Sky Harbor (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |