User talk:ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST

Welcome[edit]

Hello ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 02:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Chris Barfoot. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 07:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Barfoot, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 13:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce. Please delete the entire page. It serves no useful purpose. Thanks. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like the article deleted, you need to nominate it for deletion. Please follow the instructions at how to nominate a single page for deletion. —Bruce1ee ^talk 13:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I am not permitted to edit the page that reflects my name- how may the problems be addressed that you and others have cited? You are not prepared to examine updated information and so- the page is pointless. I am sure you can remove the page without my input... which is forbidden under your 'rules'. The page does not fully reflect the work produced and is therefore beneath the usual standards expected of Wikipedia. As the page reflects 'me'... and you have issues with said page- please delete it. Thank you BL...ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You won't be adding to or changing the content to the article, so editing it just to nominate it for deletion won't be a problem. But you must be logged in to complete the process. —Bruce1ee ^talk 15:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... So, I made an error by attempting to update a wiki page... about me? It was calling for verification (for years) and I thought who better than I to try and solve the issue. Then, you and others chose to castigate me rather than examine the update and citations supplied. So... you're not here to assist in the search for fact- you are, in fact determined to decline information on a sort of elitist ego trip? You could research the material and edit it to suit the requirements that you specify... But, you don't?

The page has been up for like 15 years or something like that and in that time fans have made alterations and sometimes butchered it... You don't want to fix it and you don't want to kill it... bravo... We'll leave it as testimony to your humility, sir.

Thanks for opening my eyes regarding how this setup is run- Obviously I won't be giving a donation this time- Cheers Brucie... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors? Trolls? Have you earned another silly badge today? Goody for you... keep going with it... maybe you'll have more silly badges by the end... you can stick them in a scrapbook... for your grandchildren to one day find... and marvel at the fantastic waste of time. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You harassed me... perhaps your Administrator will note that? I have simply answered your commentary... Don't like it? Shush then... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete me, block me... you trolls are fearful of truth... do what you will... but please... do get a life. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd better get it out the way now then hadn't I... You troll do nothing good for the Wiki brand. Your boring empty lives have led to this... silly people... Why don't you champion my page- without castigation and resurrect it... instead of murdering it? It's a lot more work and you may lose the race to win more badges than your peers... but- more worthwhile in the end... it would give your life more meaning to create than to destroy. I know... being a creator... that you don't recognise... You don't like my replies? Ok... then don't make comments... Blocking me will make your lives better? Oh... because I will not be able to answer your pathetic comments... gotcha. Do whatever makes you happy... somebody will read all this... and make their own mind up about me... and about you... all of you... Now, please stop with the boring threats and get on with your 'interesting' lives... MUCH LOVE TO YOU ALL ;-) ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 13:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I seem to be alienating folk... This is not my kung fu... 2A02:C7C:D4E6:3D00:9D3D:62CC:4BFB:E850 (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from editing articles where you have a strong connection[edit]

Hello, ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Chris Barfoot, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You may also refer to WP:AUTO#IFEXIST for information about what to do when an individual discovers a Wikipedia article already exists about them and they wish to expand it. —C.Fred (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fred. I see. Well... that discounts my personal involvement. Catch 22... I have learned much from your advice. Thank you for taking the trouble to educate me. Cheers. All the best. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thin ice[edit]

Even the existing version is on thin ice, as ref 1 does not confirm any fact content, refs 2, 3 and 4 do not work, and 5 is your name in list 97 pages long. My best advice - continue to succeed in your career, and maybe people will fix the article after you are dead. David notMD (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Your riff on your career, albeit interesting, will soon vanish from the active Teahouse screen, as Teahouse content is archived every ten days. David notMD (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David- I have no idea about the existing version, it was created by a fan. I'm not permitted to 'fix' the issues, I cannot speak for that set up. Why not check out the version I attempted to upload?

Someone fixing the page after I am dead... dead famous... hmm... haha... I'll mention it to my agent. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not check out the version I attempted to upload? I did, and it was lacking in reliable secondary sources. That's why I have nominated the article for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Lacking in reliable secondary sources? What about the original sources? You (Wiki) doesn't ask for secondary sources? Everything is legitimate. What problems have you found? Please elucidate... I will make further research on 'your' behalf. Much of what you seek... supposedly can be found at IMDB... films, awards etc... here... I'll do that for you too... https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1084898/ ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia rejects IMDb as not reliable because anyone can edit it. David notMD (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The awards are linked to those organisations that allocate them and listed on IMDB- a recognised industry resource? You have not looked into this. Your comments are blasé. If you go through the process of actual investigation - you will find this to be so. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is absolutely NOT a reliable source here because it is user edited, see WP:IMDb and the organisations that allocate the awards are NOT independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is also user-edited... you have negated the validity of this site by virtue of your own observations. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct which is why Wikipedia can't be used as a source and why the article about you has been nominated for deletion because it has no reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The update I attempted to upload had plenty of good sources. If other sources were needed- they could have been sourced and the page would have been a work in progress... but the badge seeking trolls simply eradicate and praise each other for their pathetic destructive interaction. Get a life... and if you really wish to be service to Wikipedia... help to seek out the sources that qualify rather than reject... out of laziness. Do better... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 16:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Continued childish personal attacks are not likely to persuade anyone here to help you. If you have any reliable sources you can present them on the article talk page for consideration. Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Childish personal attacks? It is an OPEN attack on all trolls... and if that includes you.. then good- take it personally... are you a troll?

Let me get you started in your new career as a truth giver for Wikipedia. I will supply you with a few links... to film festivals for example, that have honoured a few of my films and screenplays. You may seek to go further or to continue to play ignorant... your choice... https://www.dragoncon.org/filmfest/2006/h-m-2006/helix/ https://www.dragoncon.org/filmfest/history/2002-index/ (magical realism) http://lareelfilmfest.com/2021_Winners.html LA... Honorable Mention second listed winner...

There are many more... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But they are not independent sources? Wikipedia has no interest in "truth" it is based on reliable independent sources and your comment above is another personal attack. Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is only a personal attack if you perceive yourself to be a troll...

"Wikipedia has no interest in truth"... and "based on reliable independent sources" but not the originators of the information...? Is that your personal thinking or fact? Personally- I think such thoughts are barmy... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is fact Wikipedia is based on reliable independent sources, absolutely NOT the originators of the information. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And there lies the problem... verification can ONLY come from the originator. This site is nuts... you validate the citing of interlopers as doctrine... not the originator... that's like saying God is meaningless but the parson rules? Not that I'm religious... you neither I would guess... as the Bible cannot be substantiated. Ok... I understand now. Goodbye. ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion[edit]

Chris Barfoot now nominated for deletion. After 7-14 days of comments, an Administrator makes a decision. David notMD (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Administrators actually Wikipedia or simply similar to the OCD trolls that earn silly badges for interacting with truth givers? I've checked your page and the pages of others with opinion here- I made the mistake of calling you moderators- and was corrected. So, what do normal human beings refer to you people as? Wikipediaphiles? That's too long... hmm... pediaphiles? That seems appropriate.

The page that currently depicts my career is inferior and as I am not permitted to bring it up to date- then- yes... it must be deleted.

I have discovered that wikipedia isn't the valuable resource that I once thought... it is coveted and policed by busybody opinionated rude trolls- whose arrogance is unwarranted. I thought you people researched information in an unbiased environment and fixed issues- but reading the accounts of many truth givers and the vile interactions of pediaphiles... many of you people are anti-fact and simply OCD in your desire to create uniformed pages. You prance about like peacocks... strutting while pretending to be intellectual yet are simply destructive. RESEARCH the information provided and seek to do better- or wikipedia will fall- because donation givers are often also the truth givers- that you are dissing.

I don't give a damn about your sad boring lives... but you could rise above the trolling and become respected wise finders of fact... instead of the creatures that you have become. I bet, in the beginning... of your pediaphile existence- you people were intent on being truth givers... but nitpicking to win pathetic badges lol... you are fools and I certainly do not wish to be associated with persons of your basic calibre of intellect. So... delete away... ;-) ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Civility. Theroadislong (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read this? I have been met by rude obnoxious trolls on this site... pretending to be helpful individuals... I was philosophical and pleasant in reply... You can't handle truth or strength of character... tough. I'm a fighter... You have levied your opinions and heard mine... don't cry about it- you're going to ultimately win- as the page will be deleted... but to imagine that I will not tell you people- my opinion... in reply to yours... is simply arrogant on your part. I hope this interaction earned you another badge and that you're well and happy today. ;-) ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 11:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not permitted to bring it up to date

You are welcome to request an edit at Talk:Chris Barfoot with the updated information and the reliable sources, preferably secondary sources, that support it. I have seen no such requests from you, however. —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Fred... I have made my case... you and your fellow trolls have revealed why such a 'request' isn't viable. Do not pretend to offer good intentions- it was David's advice to wait until 'dead'... and you were one of the first to offer the page up for deletion... So... take your fake good intentions and your new badge (lucky boy)... and go take a running jump... Basically... just do your thing, and go away troll... ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 13:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you attack another editor you will blocked indefinitely. This should be understood as a FINAL WARNING. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... John... an educated American person of the same birth year, fantastic... Welcome- apologies that you find yourself caught up in this calamitous maelstrom of debacle debate and mayhem... It is honourable that you should come to the aid of the drowning trolls... hmm... are you one also?

Let's take a chance... I elect you to investigate the merits of the page in question... not in its current form- that is rather dire... but with the hidden inclusions. Remember- it has survived since 2009 (apparently) without cause for concern- until I attempted to answer the call for verification...and then... out came the big guns and badges...

Your threat aside- nice to meet you. CB ATLANTEAN PROTAGONIST (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]