User talk:99.236.189.100

September 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to StarCraft professional competition. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. de Bivort 05:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Ex-gay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use article pages such as Conversion therapy for general discussion of the topic. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Placing false user warnings, such as this and this, can be viewed as harrassment of those who reverted your vandalism (which can be seen here, here, here, etc). Continuing to disrupt Wikipedia with vandalism and false user warnings could result in your account being blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 04:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.236.189.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why do you take this so seriously?? sometimes ppl like to have a laugh U know. i would appreciate if u didnt delete my edits so quickly. if u were intelligent in anyway you would see there wer a few other things on that page that shoudlnt be there but i noticed U arent the smartest tack. im sure u dont have anythinh better to do then revert edits 2 restore hatefil articles so enjoi ur borin, meaningless life. - amanda.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.236.189.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i told U that ur protectin relli mean articles. also, U think ur better than everi1 else but Ur not. plz stop ur power trip n stop msging me god!!!!! - amanda xo

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock requests will not be considered. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fat acceptance movement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Malinaccier (talk) 23:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Fat acceptance movement. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MuffledThud (talk) 00:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

deletions April 2010[edit]

Please stop deleting referenced content from the starcraft pro gaming article. de Bivort 16:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on StarCraft professional competition. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs/^Vote! 19:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Debivort#you again. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs/^Vote! 20:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to StarCraft professional competition‎. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. de Bivort 23:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOW ITS PERSONAL DE BIVORT !

Re SC2GG Bias[edit]

What other commentators do you believe should be included? NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs/^Vote! 00:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The criterion I used was whether I could find an independent source about them, e.g. one of the gosugamer interviews, and subscriber numbers on youtube. Ranshin didn't meet these criteria, for example and is from sc2gg. I think the criteria I used were totally reasonable, and if other people meet them, they should be added, rather than removing the sourced material without any explanation. de Bivort 02:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.