User talk:94.119.64.0

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 94.119.64.0, is registered to Sky UK Ltd, a mobile phone provider, and is used by many of its customers, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tracy Barlow because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Hollyoaks characters (2013) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Norwich Puppet Man has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Norwich Puppet Man was changed by 94.119.64.0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881079 on 2015-08-23T17:07:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to AdS/CFT correspondence[edit]

I just reverted the most recent changes, and I wanted to explain why. Please know that I welcome any changes to the article, provided they are technically accurate and supported by reliable citations. It would be very interesting to include a more detailed discussion of the mathematical status of the AdS/CFT correspondence, but the text you've added has some serious problems.

The main problem is that you are oversimplifying the issue. For example, when you write "The AdS/CFT correspondence has not been mathematically proven (as of 2015)", it is very unclear what you mean by the phrase "AdS/CFT correspondence". Generally speaking, this phrase does not refer to a particular duality but rather to a large collection of similar dualities. The subject does not have well defined boundaries. It's not clear to me whether you're referring only to the classic relation between type IIB string theory and N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, or whether your statement includes things like higher spin gauge theories or pure (2+1)-dimensional gravity. These are very different conjectures, and one expects the relevant mathematics to be different in each case.

It's also not clear what you mean when you talk about mathematical proof. In most instances of the AdS/CFT correspondence, the theories on the two sides of the duality are very far from being mathematically well defined. Even the theories on the CFT side are not rigorously defined, so it's hard to even pose this as a mathematical question. The AdS/CFT correspondence is not at all analogous to the Riemann hypothesis, which is a completely well defined mathematical problem.

It's possible that you're talking about "proof" in the physicist's sense, although in that case, I'm not sure why you include the statement "A mathematician, however, would not consider the hundreds of pieces of evidence in which the AdS/CFT correspondence seems to work as a proof". Like mathematicians, theoretical physicists have certain standards of rigor, and you would need to explain more precisely what counts as a "proof" of the AdS/CFT correspondence.

Aside from the imprecise nature of your contributions, the major problem is that you have not cited a single reliable source. If you have not done so already, I encourage you to review Wikipedia's policies regarding citations. This is really a very fundamental part of how Wikipedia works, and you should not expect any of your contributions to survive unchallenged if you have not included the proper references. Like I said, I would be very interested in expanding the discussion of the mathematical status of the AdS/CFT correspondence, but you'll need to find a reliable source that discusses this in a sufficiently precise way. Polytope24 (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Coronation Street characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 17:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Stephenb. Your recent edit to the page Lola Pearce appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 20:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dexter Hartman. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 20:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2012), you may be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 20:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of BSA motorcycles , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sro23 (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Valenciano. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cicada 3301 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Valenciano (talk) 18:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]