User talk:7Road

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 7Road, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Helen(💬📖) 20:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rúben Dias, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to João Cancelo has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reece James (footballer, born 1999). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 19:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please use edit summaries to explain your edits. Giant Snowman 11:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Reece James information is not tabloid, it's from a detailed BBC piece, and it's valid and should be included. Please stop removing cited, valid content. Giant Snowman 15:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Renato Sanches, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fernando Santos and Danilo Pereira. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Jota[edit]

Hi, I see that you've moved the article above from Diego Jota Martins saying "Just to shortern is full name". I'm not certain if that would be the correct location or not, also I don't know much about the player as seen on this section. This move you did could be returned to the original location with other users reflecting their views on a requested move which is what I do mostly when I think some page titles are possibly wrong. Thanks, Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diogo Dalot[edit]

Hi. I had to make extensive changes to your edits because of poor spelling and grammar. Please take greater care in future and use the preview option to check your input before saving it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UrgeDecca (talk • contribs) 07:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rúben Amorim, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Campeonato de Portugal and João Mário.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Martimc123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martimc123. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

7Road (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry but why i am being blocked for no reason at all, i dont event know who this user is and what he was blocked for, i am being accused of something without proper eveidence. Hence i request to be unblocked because this situation is not fair at all.

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns or the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martimc123. Yamla (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't do this. You are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are welcome to make a new unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

7Road (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are supposedly accusing me of being a certain user just for the way i write, that is ridicolous, if you see my edits, there are no reasons for me to be blocked at all, i have been cordial, i did not disrespected anyone, and when i did not agreed something with another user, i have asked im to disccuss it, in the talk page of the article. I am not being properly judged, just because something seems something, doesn't mean it is, you should never judge a book for its colour and that's is what you are doing right now, so again i ask you to be fair with me and unblock me please, what you found on this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martimc123 is pure coincidence, check my edits and see if they are the same.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed as a sockpuppet plus more socking since this request was made. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing administrators / CUs, 7Road has evaded this block using the account StarrX55 since filing the above unblock request. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 03:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]