User talk:76.69.3.70

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you made a change to an article, NumbersUSA, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. XOR'easter (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (NumbersUSA) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: given comments like this [1] [2] I think it is safe to say that they are WP:NOTHERE for legitimate reasons. IHateAccounts (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How are either of those comments unacceptable or evidence of 'illegitimate' intent? I am removing or contesting unacceptable content, sources and bias on that article. 76.69.3.70 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can make your point without calling people who disagree with you "vandals." What Jorm has done is not vandalism. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.