User talk:4dpeace
December 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cntras (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aga Khan IV, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SMS Talk 11:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Aga Khan IV, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.116.113 (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aga Khan IV, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Aga Khan IV was changed by 4dpeace (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915758 on 2011-12-14T05:58:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
There are some neutrality questions here and I am happy to work to clean them up. You are welcome to make corrections, but please do not blankly remove things without reasons. 67.193.116.113 (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. —slakr\ talk / 05:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Aga Khan IV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 05:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I was only erasing the data because i know more about this article than you. Besides you are writing content by observing websites which are not reliable. Who is Meher Ali. I mean why are you writing his opinions about this article?! The line you wrote that he has fondness of cars, is absolutely incorrect! What is the reason for writing about his yacht! His Financial Sources Content is also lacking information and knowledge. I will be deleting your content as many times u will delete mine! (talk) 05:11, 15 December 2011 (GMT)
I have added a response to the discussion page attached to Aga Khan IV and am trying to follow the appropriate wikipedia policy. As I mentioned there, I have not personally deleted anything you wrote. As I wrote earlier, I am happy to make changes and to improve the article. Kind Regards, FordPrefect1979 (talk) 06:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC) note: I created a user name and was ip: 67.193.116.113
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)- You have been taking out large portions of sourced text without explanation (and with blank edit summaries), and making non-neutral changes - for example, you simply cannot factually state that he is a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad without a source! If there are inaccuracies in the article, once your block expires you should discuss each one individually on the article's Talk page and get a consensus for your change before making it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I do have given valid reasons on the dicussion tab of Aga Khan IV. (talk) 27 December, 2011 )GMT)
- I have replied at the article Talk page - please now wait for some discussion and a consensus over your changes before you try making them again -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Aga Khan IV. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SMS Talk 18:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)